Vehicle Control Services PCN in a residential car park

MoneySavingPest

OK, neither letting me do pdfs at the moment. I have now added a link to a Google Drive document in my earlier post.

1505grandad

Typo  -  "Loss of earnings through attendance at court hearing 05/02/(2020): £120"  -  (2021)?

Coupon-mad

The first line of #18 needs you to edit it to make sense for your case.

If your deadline is later this week I suggest you wait until Thursday/Friday (if you can) because we might be able to suggest some new wording to add about a failed application that was made about the added £60 being an abuse...that case judgment might be useful and it's being handed down on Thursday.

nosferatu1001

Loss of earnings is capped at lower than £120

MoneySavingPest

Coupon-mad said:

The first line of #18 needs you to edit it to make sense for your case.

If your deadline is later this week I suggest you wait until Thursday/Friday (if you can) because we might be able to suggest some new wording to add about a failed application that was made about the added £60 being an abuse...that case judgment might be useful and it's being handed down on Thursday.

If your court hearing is at (say) 1600 on a Thursday, what is the very latest you can submit your WS and exhibits in order to meet the minimum 14 days ahead requirement? I assume 15:59 on the Thursday 2 weeks before? Although is it wise to leave a safety margin?

Coupon-mad

Yes I agree.

MoneySavingPest

Coupon-mad said:

The first line of #18 needs you to edit it to make sense for your case.

If your deadline is later this week I suggest you wait until Thursday/Friday (if you can) because we might be able to suggest some new wording to add about a failed application that was made about the added £60 being an abuse...that case judgment might be useful and it's being handed down on Thursday.

Any update on this? I'll need it this evening if so.

Coupon-mad

I will pm you.

MoneySavingPest

I've now had the Claimant's WS and Exhibits in the post. Two important things:
1) They have provided a copy of the landowner agreement, attached. Suspect this is sufficient to prove the landowner authority point (unless anyone here can see differently)
2) They are relying on POFA 2012 Schedule 4 to enforce Keeper Liability (not knowing who the driver is and there being 2 named drivers on the certificate of insurance). Aside from the poor signage preventing them from enforcing against the driver and hence not meeting the Condition 5(1)(a), I can't immediately see that the PCN (attached) is otherwise non-compliant (again unless anyone here can see differently). 

KeithP

I'm going to have to take your word on what those documents tell you.
They're too difficult to read on their side.
Help others to help you.