We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Court form received help requested
Comments
-
check and edit spelling , like in the statement of truth for exampleplus I thought the fee was £255 ? not £225 ? accuracy is paramount here3
-
Thankyou. I have edited now.Redx said:check and edit spelling , like in the statement of truth for exampleplus I thought the fee was £255 ? not £225 ? accuracy is paramount here2 -
As above - as in "DEFAULT JUDGMENT
I am the registered keeper at the time of the offence."
In your WS spelling is correct for "Judgment" in this context - but further use in the doc. includes an incorrect middle "e".4 -
Thank you. I will sort all the spellings before sending properly.1
-
If youre looking for the claim to be struck out at 7, why include para 3 onwards?
The two are mutually exclusive
Either you are asking the court to order the claims struck out, in whci h case you dont want costs reserved - you want your set aside fee refunded within the order - or you are not, in which case para 2 - 6 apply.
Do you understand the difference?4 -
There has been absolutely no offence committed. The word is never to be used in describing private parking events.1505grandad said:As above - as in "DEFAULT JUDGMENT
I am the registered keeper at the time of the offence."
In your WS spelling is correct for "Judgment" in this context - but further use in the doc. includes an incorrect middle "e".The way the sentence is constructed and using the word suggests some form of culpability. 'Alleged' is always useful in such circumstances to avoid any inference from the statement.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
Yep, change 'offence' to alleged parking event.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
Thankyou I have changed thisCoupon-mad said:Yep, change 'offence' to alleged parking event.0 -
I now see what you mean ....I’m not sure what the best thing to write is....nosferatu1001 said:If youre looking for the claim to be struck out at 7, why include para 3 onwards?
The two are mutually exclusive
Either you are asking the court to order the claims struck out, in whci h case you dont want costs reserved - you want your set aside fee refunded within the order - or you are not, in which case para 2 - 6 apply.
Do you understand the difference?0 -
Well what are you looking to do?
I would go with a draft order that deals with presuming the claim isnt struckl out, because that happens far more often ..3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards