Back to 60's Judicial Review Outcome

ErinGoBrath

jem16 said:

dunstonh said:

Quite ironic....

But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.

So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.

Presumably this is the end of all this selective amnesia nonsense? Unless Labour tries another election bribe in 2024?

jem16

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

dunstonh said:

Quite ironic....

But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.

So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.

Presumably this is the end of all this selective amnesia nonsense? Unless Labour tries another election bribe in 2024?

Still have the PHSO's report to see whether or not there has been maladministration.

Unfortunately it won't end. BT60 has now morphed into CedawPT (Cedaw People's Tribunal) where they will continue crowdfunding from women who can least afford it whilst leading them up the garden path.

ErinGoBrath

jem16 said:

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

dunstonh said:

Quite ironic....

But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.

So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.

Presumably this is the end of all this selective amnesia nonsense? Unless Labour tries another election bribe in 2024?

Still have the PHSO's report to see whether or not there has been maladministration.

Unfortunately it won't end. BT60 has now morphed into CedawPT (Cedaw People's Tribunal) where they will continue crowdfunding from women who can least afford it whilst leading them up the garden path.

CEDAW. Almost as ironic an acronym as WASPI.

 Couldn't make this up really.

jem16

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

dunstonh said:

Quite ironic....

But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.

So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.

Presumably this is the end of all this selective amnesia nonsense? Unless Labour tries another election bribe in 2024?

Still have the PHSO's report to see whether or not there has been maladministration.

Unfortunately it won't end. BT60 has now morphed into CedawPT (Cedaw People's Tribunal) where they will continue crowdfunding from women who can least afford it whilst leading them up the garden path.

CEDAW. Almost as ironic an acronym as WASPI.

 Couldn't make this up really.

CEDAW has some really good aspects to it but I hate it being hijacked for this purpose. So far they have an independent panel of "Judges" who are going to write some report on their findings. The panel consists of 5 female human rights activists so hardly independent and totally biased. If the Government even thought that incorporating CEDAW into UK domestic law was a good idea, they will find it easy to dismiss and ignore their findings.

ErinGoBrath

jem16 said:

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

dunstonh said:

Quite ironic....

But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.

So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.

Presumably this is the end of all this selective amnesia nonsense? Unless Labour tries another election bribe in 2024?

Still have the PHSO's report to see whether or not there has been maladministration.

Unfortunately it won't end. BT60 has now morphed into CedawPT (Cedaw People's Tribunal) where they will continue crowdfunding from women who can least afford it whilst leading them up the garden path.

CEDAW. Almost as ironic an acronym as WASPI.

 Couldn't make this up really.

CEDAW has some really good aspects to it but I hate it being hijacked for this purpose. So far they have an independent panel of "Judges" who are going to write some report on their findings. The panel consists of 5 female human rights activists so hardly independent and totally biased. If the Government even thought that incorporating CEDAW into UK domestic law was a good idea, they will find it easy to dismiss and ignore their findings.

I think anyone who describes themselves as an 'activist' is usually an unpleasant type of person that you just cannot reason with. They are mostly blinkered and a bit thick.

jem16

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

ErinGoBrath said:

jem16 said:

dunstonh said:

Quite ironic....

But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.

So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.

Presumably this is the end of all this selective amnesia nonsense? Unless Labour tries another election bribe in 2024?

Still have the PHSO's report to see whether or not there has been maladministration.

Unfortunately it won't end. BT60 has now morphed into CedawPT (Cedaw People's Tribunal) where they will continue crowdfunding from women who can least afford it whilst leading them up the garden path.

CEDAW. Almost as ironic an acronym as WASPI.

 Couldn't make this up really.

CEDAW has some really good aspects to it but I hate it being hijacked for this purpose. So far they have an independent panel of "Judges" who are going to write some report on their findings. The panel consists of 5 female human rights activists so hardly independent and totally biased. If the Government even thought that incorporating CEDAW into UK domestic law was a good idea, they will find it easy to dismiss and ignore their findings.

I think anyone who describes themselves as an 'activist' is usually an unpleasant type of person that you just cannot reason with. They are mostly blinkered and a bit thick.

I daresay they don't describe themselves as activists but all are heavily involved in Human Rights for women only so rather stacked in my opinion. An independent panel should consist of more.

mystic_trev

It would appear the Backto60  group now go by the name of CEDAWinLaw. Their latest effort is to convene, what appears to be, a Kangaroo Court, or what they refer to as ‘People’s Tribunal’

**ANNOUNCEMENT**

CEDAWinLAW

People's Tribunal

'To examine the State Pension age deferrals on 1950's Women' will be livestreamed on 13th July 2022

Hon Dr Jocelynne Scutt AO

Judge

Dr Nazir Afzal OBE QC

Dr Charlotte Proudman

Legal Consultants

John Cooper QC

David Hencke

Patrons