We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Back to 60's Judicial Review Outcome

12829303133

Comments

  • brewerdave
    brewerdave Posts: 8,827 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The Xmas bonus of £10 is only paid when one is actually drawing the State Pension.
    I received the Winter Fuel Allowance once I reached my pension credit eligibility age but, as I deferred my State Pension for several years, I only got the extra 10 quid the first Xmas after I claimed SP.
  • GunJack
    GunJack Posts: 11,884 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Ganga wrote: »
    it is such a small amount the goverment would be better off giving it to the NHS :(

    This is eminently far too sensible for any Govt. to do, and can you imagine the outrage if they tried to do it, even though to the individual it's not really significant.


    ...and before I get flamed for the last part of the above, if £10 once a year is enough to be sooo significant, I suggest the individuals concerned are doing something wrong for the other 364 days a year they don't get it...
    ......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......

    I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple :D
  • Ganga
    Ganga Posts: 4,253 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    GunJack wrote: »
    This is eminently far too sensible for any Govt. to do, and can you imagine the outrage if they tried to do it, even though to the individual it's not really significant.


    ...and before I get flamed for the last part of the above, if £10 once a year is enough to be sooo significant, I suggest the individuals concerned are doing something wrong for the other 364 days a year they don't get it...

    Agree 100% :T
  • badmemory
    badmemory Posts: 10,049 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If I thought for a moment that this government would actually pay my Winter fuel payment £200 & the £10 to the NHS I would say take it with my good wishes. But as I wouldn't trust them with 10p of my money because they have PROVED themselves (well mostly him obviously) to be untrustworthy I'll keep my £210 & donate it where I choose.
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,339 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    badmemory wrote: »
    If I thought for a moment that this government would actually pay my Winter fuel payment £200 & the £10 to the NHS I would say take it with my good wishes. But as I wouldn't trust them with 10p of my money because they have PROVED themselves (well mostly him obviously) to be untrustworthy I'll keep my £210 & donate it where I choose.

    Our WFA is shared between 2 family members who need it more than we do. The £10 bonus isn't worth bothering about !
  • Jonty6262
    Jonty6262 Posts: 236 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic


    31/03/2021

    Supreme Court reject Back to 60s appeal

  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,385 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What a shame...  :D
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    dunstonh said:
    Quite ironic....
    But in a decision on March 26 the court said the group had failed to bring the claim within the limited time periods. Therefore it was dismissed.
    So, just as they missed the increase in state pension age, they missed filing the appeal.  I suppose if you cant be bothered to keep up with things in the early 90s, there there is no reason that would change nearly 30 years later.

    They didn't miss filing the appeal with the Supreme Court as it was filed last September within the appropriate time limits. Where it failed was because of the delay in bringing it to a Judicial Review so long after they were affected in 1995.

    The Judicial Review should really never have been given permission in the first place back in November 2018. However Justice Lang decided that there was an arguable case as the effects were ongoing. The Judges in both the Judicial Review and the Court of Appeal all disagreed with Justice Lang's decision.

    I'm glad the JR and appeal went ahead as they were unanimous in their verdict that there was no wrongdoing. I think the Supreme Court were correct though in not granting permission as it had gone on long enough.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.