NON-STOP PCN from Southend Airport ******* Case Dismissed, Now VCS appealing ********

IamWood

I was advised with the following reply. Please help with the wording -- Thanks

Dear Sirs,

Unfortunately for you I wasn't born yesterday so I won't be paying the demand, as you clearly know what I know and that there is no liability in this matter because the land is covered by its own byelaws. The signage is prohibitive and not an offer of a contract so none has been breached and anyway the POFA limits any charge to the specified sum so your demand for £160 is just a nonsense.

As VCS has been spanked at court on this very same thing several times before I suggest that you tell your client to discontinue this foolishness and that way you will at least obey the SRA rules of conduct and obey Civil Procedure as well.

Should you decide to continue then I shall be asking for a full costs recovery order for unreasonable behaviour and the seek damages for breach of the DPA as per VCS v Philip, Liverpool CC Dec 2016.

Even Will and John, the parking worlds worst solicitors seem to have got fed up with Simple Simon's stupidity and greed and presumably that is why you are wasting your ink on his behalf.

Yours faithfully

Umkomaas

If this goes to court, what would you imagine a Judge's reaction might be to reading this?

beamerguy

SCRAP THAT .... they will just laugh at you

This has to be a letter telling them what they know already and you will be using the same information if they proceed further

EG: They were told on appeal that they cannot charge the fake £60
District Judge Jones-Evans in the Caernarfon Court in Case number FTQZ4W28

They have a problem with their operation at the airport

=====================================
Unsure why you refer to Gladstones as VCS do it themselves nowadays since BWLegal kept losing for them
I am certain VCS already know how incompetent Gladstones are and would never use them. It's just the IPC they belong to

Delete the last paragraph and sit and think about what will deter them. Remember "sticks and stones"

KeithP

IamWood wrote: »

I was advised with the following reply.

Change your adviser.

IamWood

Is there a template that I can follow? I cannot find any template in the NewBies post.

Thanks a lot.

IamWood

What about the following reply? Thanks

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for your threatogram.

I won't be paying the demand for payment because I owe you nothing.
You know fully well this land is covered by its own byelaws so there
is no liability in this matter. The signage is prohibitive and not an
offer of a contract so no contract has been breached. Anyway the POFA
limits any charge to the specified sum so your demand for the
imaginary £160 is nonsense.

You, however, have broken the law by lying to the DVLA to get my
details. I am entitled to suing you for the breach of the GDPR for
unlawfully processing my personal data.

As VCS has been spanked in court on this very same thing several
times, I suggest that you discontinue this foolishness and obey the
SRA rules of conduct and Civil Procedure.

Should you decide to continue, I shall be asking for a full costs
recovery order for unreasonable behaviour and seek the damages for
breach of the DPA as per VCS v Philip, Liverpool CC Dec 2016.

A formal complaint about your predatory conduct will be made to my MP.

Yours Faithfully

Redx

My reaction is the same as Umkomaas in post #23 above

IamWood

Received the court claim through the post today. What should I do now? Please help!

Thanks in advance.

Redx

post the ISSUE date from that claim form , top right

email a SAR to the DPO at the PPC with proof of I D such as a copy of this court claim form, so they know its you for GDPR compliance (if the SAR has not already been done)

start drafting your defence and post it below for critique

IamWood

Thanks to @Redx.

The ISSUE date is 29/01/2020. I have not done the SAR yet. Is there an example of SAR?

Thanks