NON-STOP PCN from Southend Airport ******* Case Dismissed, Now VCS appealing ********

Redx

I bet JB wishes that he had travelled down south on this one in the first place !!

He still has not told us the outcome of the appeal in march 2021 that he posted about in one of his recent threads on here

IamWood

Umkomaas said:

VCS are referencing the landowner contract as in page 17 of their original WS. Having scoured your other thread, I don't think we've ever seen that can you show it please?

Here they are. Please note London Southend Airport Ltd. is not the landowner.

IamWood

Thanks very much, @Coupon-mad.

Will update after I contact my local court on Monday.

Fruitcake

According to Companies House, the company number 02078271 stated on the contract belongs to East Midlands International Airport Limited.

According to Companies House, the company number for London Southend Airport Company Limited is 02881745.

So, the company name on the contract does not match the company number on the contract.

The alleged contract therefore appears to be a false instrument.

Umkomaas

According to Companies House, the company number for London Southend Airport Company Limited is 02881745.

That's the company number showing as that of VCS in the contract!

Someone's made a real pig's ear of that contract. 🤦. And they're appealing this?  You just couldn't make it up!  

Jake, Jake, what's going on?

Coupon-mad

Nicely spotted, we will have to remember this for other Airport ones by VCS.

Fruitcake

Oh my, that's even better, I mean worse, ... no, I mean better!


The contract says, Vehicle Control Services, Company Number 02881745 but Companies House says this is the company number for London Southend Airport Company Limited.


The contract says the client is London Southend Airport Company Limited, Company Number 02078271, but Companies House says this is the company number for the East Midlands International Airport Limited.


A doubly false instrument.

IamWood

   

SayNoToPCN

Wow. So they're asking leave to appeal despite
- conceding the point
- having a contract that is at best a waste of paper and at worst an attempted fraud?

Umkomaas

SayNoToPCN said:

Wow. So they're asking leave to appeal despite
- conceding the point
- having a contract that is at best a waste of paper and at worst an attempted fraud?

... as well as exhibiting an absolutely and totally incompetent attention to detail in an administration that, I assume, Jake B supervises. Is it your department that oversees the construction of the legal contracts on which your company relies, Jake?  Are you the senior, legally qualified person on whom VCS/Excel rely?