Parking fine gladstone solicitors

nosferatu1001

The judge will do whatever they like. Some want you to speak at length, some dont, some will have read your defence and bundle and have their own idea of what they want to cover specifically, some will want a general overview.

KeithP

Have a look at this short video:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=n93eoaxhzpU

Dan_Barns

I WON GET IN
Absolutly smashed the claimant mainly on the abuse of process refrancing the beavis case award of £85 and that they are trying to charge me 4x amount. The claimant immedaitly admitted that these values are false and the judge then reduced the amount sought to £85

I then made a point on the fact that every letter sent to me said i parked in a 'no parking zone' however the signs (aka the contract) didnt have the words 'no parking zone' on it at all and instead said 'outside of a marked bay'. The judge then dissmissed the case within 5 minutes and i asked to be awarded my costs for loss of earnings and asked for £100 which he agreed.

Just want to say a big thanks to whoever commented on here and helped me along the way. It really wasnt that hard and a good experience. It saved me having to pay £414 pound to a bunch of fraudsters and cowboys. I am buzzing to say the least. Thank you

Dan_Barns

also is there any way I can get a sort of court report of what was said and the outcome?

beamerguy

Dan_Barns wrote: »

I WON GET IN
Absolutly smashed the claimant mainly on the abuse of process refrancing the beavis case award of £85 and that they are trying to charge me 4x amount. The claimant immedaitly admitted that these values are false and the judge then reduced the amount sought to £85

I then made a point on the fact that every letter sent to me said i parked in a 'no parking zone' however the signs (aka the contract) didnt have the words 'no parking zone' on it at all and instead said 'outside of a marked bay'. The judge then dissmissed the case within 5 minutes and i asked to be awarded my costs for loss of earnings and asked for £100 which he agreed.

Just want to say a big thanks to whoever commented on here and helped me along the way. It really wasnt that hard and a good experience. It saved me having to pay £414 pound to a bunch of fraudsters and cowboys. I am buzzing to say the least. Thank you

Well done, a huge spanking for Gladstones.

The claimant admitted that these values are false and the judge then reduced the amount sought to £85

That is a case for the SRA ..... Gladstones admitting the claim is false ? THAT IS A VERY SERIOUS OFFENCE

It is now a case of a full investigation into Gladstones, probably be the FCA because this sounds like WONGA all over again.
It is fraud and at the very least Gladstones should be required To pay back ALL the false amounts they have stolen from people

PLEASE
Which court
Case Number
Name of judge

Redx

Horizon beaten yet again , plus spurious costs exposed and repudiated

Well done

Another one bites the dust !!

nosferatu1001

I bet it wasnt a Gladstones rep, however

Transcript - yes, it costs you.

Coupon-mad

Dan_Barns wrote: »

also is there any way I can get a sort of court report of what was said and the outcome?

Yes you can ask the court for their transcription services and ask that service how much a short hearing would cost to transcribe.

Might be under your £100 and would be so useful to the forum, especially as you smashed it re abuse of process/adding false sums!

WELL DONE! ANOTHER HORIZON ONE BITES THE DUST!

:T

beamerguy

Now added to the Abuse of Process thread
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

GLADSTONES: .... The rep sent by Gladstones admitted to the judge that the fake add-ons WERE FALSE This is now what any case can turn on if the FALSE add-ons are applied
POST # 64
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76756261#Comment_76756261

beamerguy

Dan Barns .....

PLEASE
Which court
Case Number
Name of judge