BW Legal Court Hearing NHS staff

Redx

Toddygirl wrote: »

Yes DJ Grand.

great to see that this judge is repeating the same decision process

much better than you travelling round to Poole or IOW or wherever and your mum wont have to go anywhere or do anything at all

I cannot see them appealing it or starting again with lower figures of say £175 like Parking Eye do in their cases

if more judges follow this judgment and strike out, then maybe the sc@mmers will back off , ideally it needs to be every case over £175


host the pic on tinypic and add the url in your reply on here

Coupon-mad

Toddygirl wrote: »

I'm not sure how to post it. Can I just take a photo, convert to pdf and put on here?

I did say how:

Please please please post a PDF copy of the Judge's Order, hosted in Dropbox or Imgur and leave it working permanently so people can use it to ask their Judges for the same!

and:

If you can't post a working link yet, change the URL to hxxp instead of http.

Toddygirl

I can't convert to pdf.

Toddygirl

Sorry I'll have to get someone to help me do this! Bear with me. Thanks so much everyone on this site!

beamerguy

Toddygirl wrote: »

Just to let you know that the Claim has been struck out by IW Court as an abuse of process (re Parking Eye v Beavis) knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover.

Thank you all so much for your help.

Well done :T

They did it again ..... after being told by a judge they practice ABUSE OF PROCESS again.
Doubt Britannia will pay them for ABUSE OF PROCESS. But, Britannia are just as much to blame if they let this legal run riot with their money.

This is going to happen more and more, I wonder how long the courts will accept the BWLegal rubbish

Toddygirl, to assist others, I have linked your thread to
Abuse of Process ... District Judge tells BWLegal

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

Toddygirl

In the County Court of Newport (IOW)

BRITANNIA PARKING GROUP LIMITED T/A BRITANNIA PAR

Before District Judge Grand

It is ordered that:-

1. The Claim is struck out as an abuse of process.

Reasons

The Claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverable under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgement in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process for the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover.

2. This order has been made by the Court of it's own initiative without a hearing pursuant to Rule 3.3(4) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1997 and a party affected by the order may apply to have it set aside varied or stayed not more than 7 days after the date the order was served upon that party.

Dated 2 July 2019

Toddygirl

Please use the above to help others 🤗👍

Fruitcake

Have you complained to the hospital trust/CEO that they have employed scammers who are using scamlicitors who are abusing the court process?

Have you complained to your MP about this unregulated scam.

Do you have a Union rep who should be warning other hospital workers?

Toddygirl

Good point, will do.

Umkomaas

What about a complaint to the SRA - a solicitor disrespecting court judgments by continuing to issue claims with over-inflated charges despite knowing that a Judge has already dismissed other cases on the basis of abuse of process.

Do the SRA condone them continuing in this way?