Bw legal portswood car park, southampton

Coupon-mad

I will add it to the next edit of the NEWBIES thread soon!

EDIT - THERE IS NOW A TEMPLATE DEFENCE (TOP OF THIS FORUM).

Mahershalalhashbaz

CEC16 wrote: »

Had a call from BW legal on Friday last week, asking me if id recieved their "offer" to pay £170...and had I given it any further considertation....

CEC16 wrote: »

TODAY, home from work, and a letter has arrived.
Its Headed
GENERAL FORM OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER In the Southampton County Court
Claim number XXXXXXXX
Date 10th June 2019
Britannia PArking group ltd, T/A Brittania parking 1st claimant REF XXXXXXX
MY Name 1st Defendant Ref
Before District Judge Taylor sitting at the County Court at Southampton London Road Southampton IT IS ORDERED THAT
The claim is struck out as an abuse of process

Presumably BW Legal were aware that their claim had been struck out when they nonetheless approached the defendant for £170 to settle the case. This would seem to take abuse of process to a whole new level.

Fruitcake

Mahershalalhashbaz wrote: »

Presumably BW Legal were aware that their claim had been struck out when they nonetheless approached the defendant for £170 to settle the case. This would seem to take abuse of procedure to a whole new level.

Gosh, are you suggesting that [STRIKE]the scamlicitors [/STRIKE] this upstanding legal company were acting in an underhand manner?

Perish the thought.

beamerguy

Mahershalalhashbaz wrote: »

Presumably BW Legal were aware that their claim had been struck out when they nonetheless approached the defendant for £170 to settle the case. This would seem to take abuse of process to a whole new level.

No doubt .... but, we are talking about BWLegal here and NOT professionals by any stretch

Mahershalalhashbaz

Fruitcake wrote: »

Gosh, are you suggesting that [STRIKE]the scamlicitors [/STRIKE] this upstanding legal company were acting in an underhand manner?

Perish the thought.

beamerguy wrote: »

No doubt .... but, we are talking about BWLegal here and NOT professionals by any stretch

As I look forward to my day in the same court to defend myself against a claim relating to the same car park, this thread provides useful insights into those bringing the case against me.

It does seem an indictment of the justice system if such underhand activity by BWLegal should go without sanction.

Coupon-mad

As I look forward to my day in the same court to defend myself against a claim relating to the same car park, this thread provides useful insights into those bringing the case against me.

Best of luck!

CEC16

Just a little update, still no response from the SRA, in fairness they do have a few days left to be able to reply. In the meantime I have contacted BW Legal, Under the GDPR rules I have requested a copy of every singl;e piece of correspondence they have sent me, The details of my Account, and a list of every phone call they have made, answered or not. Not sure what exactly Im going to do with this yet, any ideas

CEC16

Another update

Got another General Form of judgement or order in the post today

it reads

Before His Honour Judge Iain Hughes QC sitting at Winchester County Court at Winchester, The law courts, Winchester

UPON reading the file


This is an application to set aside the order of the District Judge Taylor dated 23rd May 2019
The order was made on the initiative of the court. The Claimant did not attend and is entitled to apply to have the order set aside.

This and any similar applcations are to be listed before a full time district judge, sitting at Southampton time estimate 30 minutes, first open date.

Dated 16th July 2019


So, what does that mean?

KeithP

Firstly, I am not a lawyer.

But it looks to me that His Honour Judge Iain Hughes QC has decided that the 'abuse of process' Order, see post #10 above, should not have been made.

It also suggests that similar Orders, possibly others in Southampton and those in Newport IOW, should also be set aside.

I don't know what you should do about it though.

Coupon-mad

This and any similar applications are to be listed before a full time district judge, sitting at Southampton time estimate 30 minutes, first open date.

Keep us updated.