CCJ issued by Excel at my place of work!, options for getting it set aside?

aardll

Coupon-mad said:

Not sure that has the bit about the DVLA telling PPCs they should use a tracing agent. Can anyone recall where that was said, because I know it was but can't recall in what document or FOI?

was this document ever found?
was hoping to quote it in the hearing tomorrow

aardll

taken from https://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/data-protection-act/:

"Keeping data on record – The KADOE contract specifies that a parking company must re-request your data for each parking event (in the case of multiple breaches). You can ask the DVLA to provide details of when your records were accessed. If they have not re-requested your data, they would be breaching the KADOE contract, and therefore not have reasonable cause."

Where does it say this in the KADOE ?

aardll

found it

"B2.2.The Customer shall use each item of the Data only for the Reasonable Cause for which it was provided. The Customer understands thateach item of the Data may be used only in relation to the particular date, 20event and purpose for which it was requested and must not be re-used for any other date, event or purpose."

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/455973/Annex_A_-_KADOE_Fee_Paying_Contract_V4.pdf

nosferatu1001

This isnt about tracing you after the event,  but it is about them not being able to request data once for 2-10000 tickets. They have to make n requests for n tickets. 

aardll

ok hearing was adjourned today, the judge said there wasn't enough time to go through all the evidence I'd submitted

furious because their rep didn't even have a copy of my witness statement, I literally had to give him a copy also proved to the judge that I'd served it to them, (although she was happy that I'd done so without even looking at my evidence).

The previous point was related to the fact that they obviously just used the same bit of data twice without asking for the data again when they issued the second CCJ.

If they'd done so they'd have seen that my address details had changed.

Irrelevant now as I don't believe I raised that point in the WS. Also judge wasn't bothered about the fact that they'd sent my details on to DCBL debt collectors despite the fact it was at that point being dealt with by the court - she noted that there was nothing in the original order about that point so it was irrelevant which I didn't really understand