Defence to VCS - please help and advice/proof read

jonesthebones

Thanks for that clarification Le-Kirk and LoC...

and in regards to the nickname, i'm no orthopaedic surgeon but really I just got the name Jones off the tv show I was watching at the time and thought 'hey bones rhymes with jones that might sound cool'

jonesthebones

Castle....Interesting stuff that thank you.
Now to see if i can work that into my WS, much appreciated!!

jonesthebones

Another poster had court today and won! It was in the same car park under the same circumstances and although he didn't have a WS filed, he smashed it by the sounds of it.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76282930#Comment_76282930

The judge in his case wasn't interested in the things about who was the landowner; more the signage and abuse of process. Unless anyone suggests otherwise, I was going to take out those bits because if its not going to be received well seems unnecessary...

U414830

Known entrapment known PPC known car park all positive for you

Le_Kirk

jonesthebones wrote: »

The judge in his case wasn't interested in the things about who was the landowner; more the signage and abuse of process. Unless anyone suggests otherwise, I was going to take out those bits because if its not going to be received well seems unnecessary...

.............. and if you don't get the same judge, maybe one who says "where are all your landowner etc. points?"

jonesthebones

Le_Kirk wrote: »

.............. and if you don't get the same judge, maybe one who says "where are all your landowner etc. points?"

Good point, I already know we don't have the same judge as we have already checked.
In that case, leave it in I shall ! I appreciate your guidance Le-Kirk

jonesthebones

I was thinking of emailing VCS this..

To the litigations team of Vehicle Control Services Ltd,

On the 17th of September 2019 a claim was struck out by the Court in The County Court of Derby.
Case number XXXXX
The Defendant in that case, xxxxxxx, was contesting your breach of contract claim which is exactly the same as the current claim you hold against me in Case XXXXXX.
In light of the Defendants win, I invite you dismiss the claim you hold against me to save any costs on your behalf. In the event that your claim against me is struck out by the Court also, I will be pursuing for costs and bring a costs schedule with me on the day.

Sincerely,
xxxxxxx


good idea?

Coupon-mad

struck out

Nope - say that a claim of very similar facts was dismissed.

Include your costs schedule NOW for a few hundred, to force them to reconsider.

jonesthebones

Okay thanks coupon like, I'll change that wording and add a schedule

Le_Kirk

Change this: -

I invite you dismiss the claim you hold against me

to this: -

I invite you to dismiss the claim you hold against me