Im going to court!

Umkomaas

Azrael125 wrote: »

I cant find the case in Google currently if anyone on here can link to it would be appreciated.

http://www.parking-prankster.com/more-case-law.html

CS049 on the list.

Azrael125

*deleted"* already posted.

Azrael125

Umkomaas wrote: »

http://www.parking-prankster.com/more-case-law.html

CS049 on the list.

Thanks,I was actually referring to Horizon VS Philip Jennings which I cannot find. I can find Excel vs Nick Jennings

Ignore please seems I am familair with Horizon case,and did indeed cite it in my previous WS,but didnt have his full surname..

Coupon-mad

Horizon VS Philip Jennings

Never heard of that one, but if all these are county court cases they have no clout.

Azrael125

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Never heard of that one, but if all these are county court cases they have no clout.

It seems that Phillip Jennings must be the Horizon vs Mr J at Guildford case I assume,as I cited Mr J at Guildford in my WS at previous hearing on grounds of forbidden parking/permit holders only. How they have his full name I dont know.
They are basically saying the jdugement in that case doesnt apply because I am a regular use of car park threfore know terms and if it was forbidding I wouldnt park there lol. *logic fail*

Coupon-mad

Where did you find that one, in a Prankster blog?

Azrael125

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Where did you find that one, in a Prankster blog?

I dont recall where I found it or how, but it is on there yes https://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/11/horizon-parking-youve-been-gladstoned.html

Edit to add:Gladstones brought that case and also mine so that is how they have the ful name.

Azrael125

Can someone remind me of the "cannot assume keeper is driver" rule? Also as they are stating on most recent Ws that I have parked many times,am I right in thinking if they then go to DVLA for keeper details they are in breach of a code? It may be good to just throw that in the mix.
Not sure this would apply to present case as they are referring to alledged further PCNs of which no evidence is supplied.

Coupon-mad

Can someone remind me of the "cannot assume keeper is driver" rule?

search the forum for Witness statement Henry Greenslade and you will find someone's written before.

Redx

Azrael125 wrote: »

Also as they are stating on most recent Ws that I have parked many times,am I right in thinking if they then go to DVLA for keeper details they are in breach of a code? It may be good to just throw that in the mix.
Not sure this would apply to present case as they are referring to alledged further PCNs of which no evidence is supplied.

they have to pay for & get the keepers details each time they wish to issue a pcn to a keeper , regardless (under their KADOE contract)

they cannot create their own database and bypass the DVLA , especially as keepers can change etc

they may well hold the data for a period of time, but it does not absolve them out of paying for new details each and every time, if they didnt ask the dvla each and every time , they are in breach of their KADOE contract, hence why you ask the DVLA for all the times the keeper data was accessed , then compare it to what is alleged (then you notify the DVLA of any breaches)