We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mobile phone awareness course
Comments
-
-
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »If you are going to try to be pedantic, it's best to make sure that your posts are grammatically correct as well!
Is "Africa a" a different place to "Africa b"?0 -
onomatopoeia99 wrote: »It would be unfortunate if the driver had borrowed your phone when stopped due to making a call in that situation.
Unfortunate that they didn't have the sense to make the call themselves rather than hand their phone to the driver?
Or have I misunderstood the situation you're describing?You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
As far as I understand it, the majority of drink-driving cases are people who've still been over the limit the next day and not realised, rather than folk who get into a car right after a heavy session.
You know when youve been to a pub and had a drink. You usually know how many drinks you have had (up to a point;)) and the strengths of drinks is available so virtually known. So we know not to drive. But the next day you don't know how much is left in your system and you don't know how long it will be there. There is some maths you can use taking the ABV figures above but even then you don't know they are correct. Further to this you don't know the affect the alcohol is having on you. Bit of a minefield with severe consequences.0 -
unholyangel wrote: »Wouldn't be the first time. They used to do that here - if you didn't have ID and were caught walking between house parties with an open bottle....they'd pour it all out and bin the empty bottle.
- Who would? The police? Because they came under fire for doing that quite recently. And whilst no doubt having the ability to mention 'drunk and disorderly' might sway most revellers to simply forget the £2 can of lager; the backlash would be much higher when dealing with £700 phones.
Would that actually remove it though? You'd still have people having a heavy night and then driving the next day. Or having a drink x amount of time ago so thinking they're okay.
What I find most remarkable is that cars have had so many gadgets and features added to them but still, no breathalyser.
Well that's because the first company to do that would get shafted in sales figures0 -
Well that's because the first company to do that would get shafted in sales figures
Re the bit in red - there are areas in the UK with notices where you can be required to hand over alcohol and it will be disposed of. Theyt are orders put in place by the local authority and enforced by the police. It is a criminal offence to refuse to hand it over.0 -
With bluetooth kits an option on any car made in the last 10+ years, and standalone hands free kits for £10, there's really no reason that people are still doing it.
You're assuming people only use their phone to make calls. Bluetooth kits are no use when you want to check social media, send a text, 'like' someone's photo of their lunch etc.0 -
Mercdriver wrote: »Re the bit in red - there are areas in the UK with notices where you can be required to hand over alcohol and it will be disposed of. Theyt are orders put in place by the local authority and enforced by the police. It is a criminal offence to refuse to hand it over.
You mean public spaces protection orders.
Yes those exist; they’re terrible bits of legislation0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards