Brexit the economy and house prices part 7: Brexit Harder

Moby

https://www.channel4.com/news/revealed-how-leave-eu-faked-migrant-footage


It turns out that Leave.EU – is now accused by Channel 4 news of staging a ‘migrants’ crossing that was used in the referendum campaign and filming it using three people on the British coast. Are there no depths to which they will not stoop!

Malthusian

And did you know this picture wasn't taken in front of a real Jobcentre?



The lies. The lies! When's the Emergency Budget?

Tromking

Malthusian wrote: »

And did you know this picture wasn't taken in front of a real Jobcentre?



The lies. The lies! When's the Emergency Budget?

A Saatchi and Saatchi (sp!) Ad Agency creation if I recall correctly.

Enterprise_1701C

Herzlos wrote: »

What facts were missing from the 1975 referendum?

http://eutruth.org.uk/fco30.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9233096/Europe-alienates-us-all-as-foretold-40-years-ago.html

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Brexit/Background

https://politicspoliticalforum.com/threads/36177-Nobody-has-mentioned-FCO-30-1048

Moby

Enterprise_1701C wrote: »

http://eutruth.org.uk/fco30.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9233096/Europe-alienates-us-all-as-foretold-40-years-ago.html

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Brexit/Background

https://politicspoliticalforum.com/threads/36177-Nobody-has-mentioned-FCO-30-1048

I started reading your first link and inmmediately saw the heading......'Heath knew it was treason'......lower down your link asserts that Edward Heath was a greater traitor to this country than Lord Haw Haw....
Your second link is an article by Christopher Booker in the Torygraph.......of course Bookers other claim to fame is that he holds some pretty kooky views. His Wikipedia entry....
On a range of health issues, Booker has put forward a view that the public is being unnecessarily "scared", as detailed in his book Scared to Death. Thus he argues that asbestos, passive smoking[2] and BSE[14] have not been shown to be dangerous. His views on these matters go against scientific consensus, and as a result have attracted much criticism from other journalists as well as public bodies. Thus his articles on asbestos and on global warming have been repeatedly challenged by George Monbiot of The Guardian,[15][16] and the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has repeatedly refuted his claims about asbestos.
Booker has repeatedly claimed that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder" and poses a "non-existent" risk to human health,[1......


Have a word with yourself mate and improve your research!

Enterprise_1701C

Well, it's hardly going to be on a platform you would be willing to believe is it? Something concealed by our government alongside your beloved eu? Noooooo, can't happen.

The fact is it did.

https://human-synthesis.ghost.io/2017/11/22/secret-papers-cfo-1048-reveiled/

mayonnaise

Enterprise_1701C wrote: »

Well, it's hardly going to be on a platform you would be willing to believe is it? Something concealed by our government alongside your beloved eu? Noooooo, can't happen.

The fact is it did.

https://human-synthesis.ghost.io/2017/11/22/secret-papers-cfo-1048-reveiled/

Other article to be found on this site: "The Scrolls of the Muslim Intrusion"
I suggest you stop digging for your own sake, as you're posting rather Anders Breivik-y links now.

Herzlos

Enterprise_1701C wrote: »

http://eutruth.org.uk/fco30.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9233096/Europe-alienates-us-all-as-foretold-40-years-ago.html

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Brexit/Background

https://politicspoliticalforum.com/threads/36177-Nobody-has-mentioned-FCO-30-1048

Some interesting conspiracies, sure, but what facts were omitted from the 1st referendum? What did we know and hide?


Did Heath know this stuff, or was it cobbled together after the fact? Is there any reliable source for FCO30/1048? What's written there seems to fit the Brexiteer narrative too closely.



And Remain is supposedly the one relying on Project Fear. This stuff would be terrifying, if it had any basis in reality.

Enterprise_1701C

Herzlos wrote: »

Some interesting conspiracies, sure, but what facts were omitted from the 1st referendum? What did we know and hide?


Did Heath know this stuff, or was it cobbled together afte6r the fact? Is there any reliable source for FCO30/1048? What's written there seems to fit the Brexiteer narrative too closely.



And Remain is supposedly the one relying on Project Fear. This stuff would be terrifying, if it had any basis in reality.

It is a public record but has not been digitised. You can order a copy if you want https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11018818

Malthusian

Herzlos wrote: »

Is there any reliable source for FCO30/1048? What's written there seems to fit the Brexiteer narrative too closely.

It says it all about the nature of this debate that documents published by our own government and taken from a gov.uk site can be disregarded if they "fit the Brexiteer narrative too closely".

Any documents published by our own government which fit the Remainer narrative are of course unquestionable fact, even if they are predictions about the future.

If FCO30/1048 was a Hitler Diaries type thing it would have been discovered by now.

P.S. It appears to have been digitised here: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/acft/FCO+30+1048.pdf