Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brexit the economy and house prices part 7: Brexit Harder

1229230232234235768

Comments

  • movilogo
    movilogo Posts: 3,235 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Norway is not in the EU and has FoM. Farage who wants to leave the EU suggested Norway.

    Don't assume Farage's definition of Leave is same as everyone else's :D

    Norway is in SM and SM comes with 4 freedoms.

    CU may or may not include FOM but as the name is "custom" it means it entirely depends on what deal UK agrees with EU.
    Happiness is buying an item and then not checking its price after a month to discover it was reduced further.
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    movilogo wrote: »
    If you ask me one single parameter which defines IN/OUT of EU, it is FOM.

    If FOM continues we are in EU. If FOM stops, we are out of EU.

    A large problem with the referendum is that people don't even understand what EU membership is. Freedom of movement is part of the single market, which Labour had as their manifesto pledge. So they have a mandate for pursuing it.
    movilogo wrote: »
    The problem is that we need FoM (for the NI border, and to fill jobs) despite telling everyone their lives would be better if we ended it

    AFAIK official government policy is still that EU membership is better for everyone. We're implementing brexit as a worse option because more people turned up on a day three years ago.
    movilogo wrote: »
    Don't assume Farage's definition of Leave is same as everyone else's :D

    All the brexit supporting politicians want to increase their relative wealth compared to the rest of is.
  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    movilogo wrote: »
    Don't assume Farage's definition of Leave is same as everyone else's :D
    We're constantly being told on here there's only one way of leaving and all leave voters knew exactly what that way is. ;)
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • movilogo
    movilogo Posts: 3,235 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    A large problem with the referendum is that people don't even understand what EU membership is.

    I don't think even MPs understand that either. It is intentionally obfuscated so that people in power can interpret it whatever way they want.

    It seems such interpretation only becomes a problem when common people tries :D

    Hence, we should take voting rights away from common people?
    We're constantly being told on here there's only one way of leaving and all leave voters knew exactly what that way is.

    We were also continuously being told that sky would fall over us if UK decides to leave EU. So works both ways :D
    Happiness is buying an item and then not checking its price after a month to discover it was reduced further.
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    movilogo wrote: »
    I don't think even MPs understand that either. It is intentionally obfuscated so that people in power can interpret it whatever way they want.

    If you believe Farage, Johnson & Mogg then I'd see how you would think that.

    They understand it, they just aren't explaining it.
    movilogo wrote: »
    Hence, we should take voting rights away from common people?

    The educated common people didn't believe them, so the solution would obviously be to improve education.
    movilogo wrote: »
    We were also continuously being told that sky would fall over us if UK decides to leave EU. So works both ways :D

    No you weren't, the sky can't fall in. You were told that we'd be worse off. A lot of leavers are still clinging to the possibility that won't happen, because the elite said we might be better off (i.e. the elite will be, the rest won't).
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,924 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    movilogo wrote: »
    Don't assume Farage's definition of Leave is same as everyone else's :D


    True, but as an MEP, leader of UKIP and poster boy for the Leave campaign, I'd assume he's got a better idea of what leaving the EU means than most.


    Even if he didn't, he still advertised Norway as being a valid leave option. If that's not true, then he should be held to account for lying and the referendum unwound.


    It also beautifully illustrates how disjointed Leave is - despite all the claims that everyone wants the same thing (which changes with every setback). 2 years ago no-one was talking about a no-deal, because we were going to get the easiest deal in history.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AG47 wrote: »
    It's not what anybody wants, but it's the default if there I no agreement.

    I'm sorry to say, but no agreement is what is happeneing
    We can revoke article 50 unilateral not that I think that would be a good thing.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Norway is not in the EU and has FoM. Farage who wants to leave the EU suggested Norway.


    Turkey has a CU but no FoM and isn't in the EU.


    The problem is that we need FoM (for the NI border, and to fill jobs) despite telling everyone their lives would be better if we ended it
    That is not correct and Farage's qoute is taken out of context.
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 April 2019 at 12:46PM
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Even if he didn't, he still advertised Norway as being a valid leave option. If that's not true, then he should be held to account for lying and the referendum unwound.

    I don't know if it counts as lying, just a general part of the disinformation campaign.

    He talks a lot about norway and how great it is, but doesn't say that the norway model was a valid option. Like Boris "wouldn't it be great if we gave the NHS 350 million a week".

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=fNCwcTu9U6U

    He would argue that he only said it would be great if we were like Norway "Rich, free, catching your own fish." and forget everything else, it's basically cake 2.0
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mayonnaise wrote: »
    We're constantly being told on here there's only one way of leaving and all leave voters knew exactly what that way is. ;)
    That may be true but it fairly obvious what leave voters concerns were and a Norway style leave satisfies none of them.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.