One Parking Solution - Visitors Space PCN

fakdeworld

Thanks. I will do that.

fakdeworld

Do you think they will go after him? To be honest I was thinking about giving them any name and address in Poland. I really doubt it, they will chase any person back there. People were never chased for speeding tickets or parking fees received in other countries, back in there. Well ,at least I never heard of it. But I already get my appeal rejected, so it’s still ok to provide them with driver details? Thanks

Le_Kirk

You have been advised to start your own thread NOT keep asking questions on this one.

AOneVS

Update, received this from Gladstones yesterday:

Amount due: 160.00

We act on behalf of the Claimant and we have now been instructed to commence legal action against you to recover the amount due above, as you have failed to settle the debts that are owing, or provide a valid reason for non-payment. We understand that our client has written to you to request payment but the amounts are still outstanding.

The charge amount includes 60 claimed by our Client for the time spent and resource facilitating the recovery of the charge. The amount is a pre-determined and nominal contribution to our Client's losses as a direct result of your non-payment.

In the event the outstanding debt is not paid in full, we are instructed to commence legal proceedings. Our client is satisfied that it has sufficient evidence to support this claim and if necessary, will rely on this evidence in Court.

If you believe you have a valid reason for non-payment, you are able to reply pursuant to Paragraph 4 of the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims under the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 ('the PAP'). A version of the Information Sheet and Reply Form taken from the PAP can be completed on our website https://www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk. Before completing the only Reply Form, you must first create a login, for which you will require your reference (). Alternatively, you can request a paper version (see overleaf).

We refer you to Paragraph 2.1(c) of the PAP which obliges the parties to act reasonably and proportionately.

Please pay or reply within 30 days of the date of this letter. Any reply received outside of the 30 day period may not be considered as legal proceedings are likely to have been issues.

Your Sincerely
*** no signature ***

beamerguy

The charge amount includes 60 claimed by our Client for the time spent and resource facilitating the recovery of the charge. The amount is a pre-determined and nominal contribution to our Client's losses as a direct result of your non-payment.

So, is this the way Gladstones are trying to get around ABUSE OF PROCESS ??

There can be no loss as a result of non payment on a charge that has not been proven in court.

However Gladstones try to explain the scam charge away, the fact is that DJ Taylor says ....

IT IS ORDERED THAT
The claim is struck out as an abuse of process

"The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the defendant contracted to pay, This additional charge is not recoverable under the protection of freedoms act 2012, Schedule 4 not with reference to the judgement in parking eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover,

This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4) of the civil procedure rules 1998 "


Should Gladstones take this court, you bring this case to the attention of the Judge
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

AOneVS

Should I be firing off a SAR now or wait a while longer?

The same question for the response to the letter before claim?

Thanks in advance.

Redx

send a SAR by email to the DPO at the PPC and get all your docs , pics and data held on you and your vehicle


attach a copy of the V5C as proof of ID

AOneVS

SAR sent to OPS (no response yet).

Emailed Gladstones to ask to stop processing data etc. Response received very quickly:

We refer to your request regarding the restriction of processing of data.

Unfortunately we cannot process your request because we can demonstrate compelling legitimate grounds for the processing of your data which override the interests, rights and freedoms of you as an individual. That legitimate interest being that we are acting on behalf of our client for the recovery of monies relating to an unpaid Parking Charge Notice.

To process your data is necessary and lawful, as it is required in furtherance of our client’s instructions, and we act for them on their rights and obligations for the recovery of such monies.

Is that expected from them?

Redx

It is unless the debt management advice words were used

They may not put it on hold even then, because they will follow their clients instructions

AOneVS

County court letter received today. Here's a breakdown of what they're claiming:

Amount claimed: 169.20 (up from £100 originally claimed)
Court fee: 25
Legal representative's cost: 50
Total: 244.20

I'll help my mum acknowledge the claim. She still hasn't received anything from the parking company regarding the SAR she requested in July.

I also heard from a neighbour on the estate that their parents got a ticket when visiting them. They are in court next week. Another neighbour has just got a ticket. This is getting ridiculous.