Morrisons .. massive data breach by one of their staff BUT ....

Johno100

beamerguy wrote: »

Wrong on both counts. Where do you get this from ??

Do read the post above by Half_way, sums it up completely
Points missed .... who cares if they cover their costs, it's
nothing to do with that .... or taxpayers money

Can't you see the contradiction in those two statements.

What nobody seems to have mentioned thus far is that there are crimnal penalties already in place if keeper details obtained from the DVLA are misused, as this chapfound to his cost.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/04/company-director-fined-inventing-road-accident-trace-private/

And he will have most likely got the data via a paper enquiry.

twhitehousescat

Johno100 wrote: »

Can't you see the contradiction in those two statements.

What nobody seems to have mentioned thus far is that there are crimnal penalties already in place if keeper details obtained from the DVLA are misused, as this chapfound to his cost.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/04/company-director-fined-inventing-road-accident-trace-private/

And he will have most likely got the data via a paper enquiry.

ok , and tell me what happened to all the parking Cos that sold data to MIL

nothing , absolutely bloody nothing

beamerguy

Johno100 wrote: »

Can't you see the contradiction in those two statements.

What nobody seems to have mentioned thus far is that there are crimnal penalties already in place if keeper details obtained from the DVLA are misused, as this chapfound to his cost.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/04/company-director-fined-inventing-road-accident-trace-private/

And he will have most likely got the data via a paper enquiry.

NO contradiction ..... this is not about how they get information
it is about Data being given to unregulated companies

Oh yes the chap paid the price but was given DVLA access
after 44 days, thanks to the BPA

This thread is about Data and not about how or when or
costs etc .... do you work for the DVLA ???

Johno100

twhitehousescat wrote: »

£100 is prescribed in law (legislation) however the DVLA are able to increase cost to PRIVATE companies whenever they wish

perhaps an increase to £50 (cash) would reduce the Robo requests , however the BPA / IPC would have to tighten up on multi claims after one request , anyone doing this should be banned by the DVLA for a period of not less than 27 yrs

The prescribed figure would obviously have to be revisited, but it will never happen because the treasury and NAO would never allow the DVLA to charge on anything but a full cost recovery basis and no more.

twhitehousescat

lets get serious , does it "really" cost the DVLA £27 to print a replacement v5

beamerguy

twhitehousescat wrote: »

lets get serious , does it "really" cost the DVLA £27 to print a replacement v5

And that's another story .... have car ... be scammed

beamerguy

Johno100 wrote: »

The prescribed figure would obviously have to be revisited, but it will never happen because the treasury and NAO would never allow the DVLA to charge on anything but a full cost recovery basis and no more.

This thread has nothing to do with this ..... It's data being
given to unregulated companies

Johno100

beamerguy wrote: »

Oh yes the chap paid the price but was given DVLA access after 44 days, thanks to the BPA.

BPA? I can't see any reference to the BPA in that story?

beamerguy wrote: »

This thread is about Data and not about how or when or costs etc .... do you work for the DVLA ???

Nope, It'd be a bit of a long commute for me.:D

Johno100

twhitehousescat wrote: »

ok , and tell me what happened to all the parking Cos that sold data to MIL

nothing , absolutely bloody nothing

Did a criminal offence occur? If you think it did then you know what to do...

beamerguy

Johno100 wrote: »

BPA? I can't see any reference to the BPA in that story?

Nope, It'd be a bit of a long commute for me.:D

You really must read these articles properly.
Quoted from that article ...

"The DVLA suspended OPC from accessing drivers’ details electronically, as the BPA carried out an investigation into the firm but just 44 days later, the trade body gave OPC a clean bill of health and the DVLA lifted the suspension."