We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

DIY Speed Cameras and Signs on Public Road - Legal?

1246

Comments

  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    JP1978 wrote: »
    Did you miss the bit in the picture that shows two of these ‘camera’s’ one pointing each way - opposite each other - possibly like one pointing one way and the other the opposite way? ....... ;)

    Yes ... yes I did. :o
  • AndyMc.....
    AndyMc..... Posts: 3,248 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The problem is that it appears that a private household or security company could be illegally recording every person who drives down that road.

    I may not be doing anything wrong but the person doing the recording likely is. That's the problem.

    I still can't see why you have a problem with that.
  • shaun_from_Africa
    shaun_from_Africa Posts: 12,858 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 18 October 2018 at 4:37PM
    Ergates wrote: »
    They look excessively large for IR sensors - most are about the size of a key fob. And why would they be shaped like a camera?
    I agree. I wouldn't want to be on that road whilst a driver is attempting to aim a unidirectional IR transmitter up at a receiver which is as high as the object shown in the OP's photograph;

    I would say that the thing shown is indeed a camera, one that bears a remarkable similarity to this
    Camera.jpg

    cam2.jpg
  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,547 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    I would say that the thing shown is indeed a camera, one that bears a remarkable similarity to this
    Camera.jpg

    Good find! I had a look, but didn't turn up anything.
  • Arklight
    Arklight Posts: 3,184 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    What a lot of fuss over nothing. Just don't break the speed limit and you won't fall out with your neighbours.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Contact council, they probably don't have planning for the signs or cameras. But no, I don't think there's anything illegal enough for the police to get involved.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,547 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    stator wrote: »
    Contact council, they probably don't have planning for the signs or cameras. But no, I don't think there's anything illegal enough for the police to get involved.
    Why "probably"?
  • It does look to me that they are cameras, and I also wouldn't be happy with someone regularly recording my car driving along. It's just feels like an invasion of privacy by another individual.

    A house at the start of my village has a fake 30 sign, but is it very obviously fake (about 3 times larger than normal and painted on wood). We do have a bit of a speeding problem and it just acts as a reminder,
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Ergates wrote: »
    Why "probably"?
    Do a search on the planning portal if you want. I haven't checked, so it's a "probably" from me.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,547 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    stator wrote: »
    Do a search on the planning portal if you want. I haven't checked, so it's a "probably" from me.

    Again why "probably"? Why, in the absence of any evidence either way, assume someone *probably* doesn't have any necessary planning permission for something? Just seems a strange assumption to make on the basis of nothing.

    If you saw someone driving down the road in a car, would you assume they probably stole it? Do you assume that shopkeepers are probably fiddling their taxes?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.