Qdr court claim received help!!!

beamerguy

Coupon-mad wrote: »

And if the Govt- arranged Independent appeals body doesn't charge PPCs for cases they suddenly offer no contest for, they will be as daft as POPLA who do this and just bleat about it (their fault for not knowing what they were doing and believing the BPA). POPLA actually thought they would be dealing with a few nice gentle appeals about someone not seeing a sign and had no idea about the legalities, and still don't understand the half of it.

The impression I got was that the appeals service would be free to the motorists, and whoever is running this could charge the PPC

My concern is who will be that person(s). What knowledge will they have and what credentials will they have to operate such a service and remain completely independent
It is a legitimate appeals service that is key to this and not some jumped up bunch like POPLA and the IPC

twhitehousescat

my concern is that if the government get involved and appoint someone do do appeals , will they be binding or not ? of you loose an appeal will you be forced to pay up ?

secondly , if this ends up on front of a judge , will a judge go against the government (agent) findings?


lastly , just out of interest , how much longer have the ombudsman service left on there contract with the BPA

"he impression I got was that the appeals service would be free to the motorists, and whoever is running this could charge the PPC"

yes this was mentioned , the wording was "by a levi"

In took this to be "join another club and pay to enter

beamerguy

As there are so many concerns, I think a new thread on here to discuss this matter would be a good idea.

Everyone can show their concerns on one thread with an email to Sir Greg pointing to the thread

Lawabiding_2

Thank you

I take it nothing else to include on allocation form then i will submit tkmorrow. I will send it via email and post.

Thanks!

I'll be back for the next stage. Can't wait until it's over

KeithP

Lawabiding wrote: »

Thank you

I take it nothing else to include on allocation form then i will submit tkmorrow. I will send it via email and post.

Thanks!

I'll be back for the next stage. Can't wait until it's over

Send your completed DQ to the same email address that you sent your Defence - see post #21 above.

Remember to send a copy to the Claimant - address on your Claim Form.

Lawabiding_2

Thank you for your help

Lawabiding_2

Hi All

I received the claimant's directions questionnaire today. They opted for mediation!? Also the email address they gave ended with Wright Hassall ! How are they allowed to get away with trading in 2 different names! Scammers !!!

KeithP

Lawabiding wrote: »

Hi All

I received the claimant's directions questionnaire today. They opted for mediation!? Also the email address they gave ended with Wright Hassall ! How are they allowed to get away with trading in 2 different names! Scammers !!!

As you have a question mark in there, I'll assume that you are asking a question.

The answer to that question can be found in Bargepole's 'what happens when' post linked from post #2 of the NEWBIES thread.


I have an email address including btinternet and another including gmail.
I am not trading as either.

Pirate_Parker

In my opinion if you can disprove keeper liability then the claim is clearly vexatious. As such I would recommend a counterclaim for harassment. You will need to go over everything you have with a fine toothed comb though to maximize the potential counter claim though, but totally worth it. The more people that can counter sue, the less likely these chancers are going to be at trying it on with someone else.

Edit: Was respondingto post #40, thought that was the end of the thread just realized it was a September post - lmao.

Lawabiding_2

Thanks

I was querying why they opted for mediation as clearly they don't want to resolve matters. I presume it's a delaying tactic.