We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Vendor digging heels over Damp & timber survey
Options
Comments
-
busbybuilders wrote: »Nice to see everyone dishing out the correct advice, but it seems your shouting at the OP.
it's the house buying system that's at fault here and primarily with RICS and the good old Banks again. The time honoured "old boy network".
For those lucky enough to not need a mortgage then ignoring the survey is easy.You can do what you like.
If you need to borrow your almost screwed. The bank will insist on a waste of time RICS survey and they in turn will refer the non existent damp readings from their !!!!!! little damp meter to the useless Property Care Association (PCA).
Until RICS learn to survey properly without a bloody damp meter this scenario will never end.
Sadly Gordon Kent from the Society for the Protection of Ancient Building's still insists rising damp exists and perpetuates the ongoing saga. Shout at RICS, PCA, SPAB, and the Council of Mortgage Lenders, now UK Finance if you want it to change.
I had that exact discussion with my buyers' non RICS building surveyor... mortgage company's insisting on potentially damaging remedial work is insane!0 -
Our mortgage people only wanted a valuation survey not a homebuyers. We then commissioned a heritage house survey as it was an older property; blooming expensive though. No damp course and no damp, and n need to show the results to the mortgage company.
I agree that the system is shot. I see it being akin to PPI - a scandal in the making. How many older buildings are put at risk through incorrect advice? Case in point my SIL has just sold an older house, now riddled with damp because they were advised when they bought it to put sandtex on the outside and a damp course in. The paint is flaking off the outside, the surface of the sandstone bricks is shot and crumbling and the house smells awful. A lot of remedial work is now needed by the new owners. It was a lovely house before the damp course and paint went on. At some point I hope this kind of advice comes back and bites the company's bottom with lawsuits.“Isn't this enough? Just this world? Just this beautiful, complex
Wonderfully unfathomable, natural world” Tim Minchin0 -
"Seller wants to help me . . . but I'm well beyond that!"
What a strange thread :cool:0 -
Our mortgage people only wanted a valuation survey not a homebuyers.
The mortgage provider is almost always only interested in a valuation, it is rare for them to request anything more detailed.
All the lender is interested in is whether they can recoup the balance of the loan, in the event the borrower stops making their repayments, and does the property represent suitable security for the loan.0 -
Bacon_Sandwich wrote: »Thanks. there was no smell or stains or sign of any damp when we viewed on 3 occasions plus a further viewing to measure for furniture/curtains. its a nicely kept lived-in house. So i don't see why they'd kick up a fuss
Because the con artist/cowboy/salesman you are using will almost certainly recommend expensive and unnecessary work because thats what they do and lead to you wanting to drop the price.
Surprised you cant understand this after it being explained to you in multiple previous posts all making the same point, you've asked a salesman to go roudn and see if theres something he can sell you.Bacon_Sandwich wrote: »OK I've dug out what they said in email to the EA.
"While we acknowledge the requirement for a damp & timber survey, and are happy to accommodate, we have concerns regarding the company that **** have employed to carry out the survey. Having spoken the firm in question, and taking the liberty of researching them on the internet, we think we have valid reason to object to their employment on this occasion. Our concerns stem from the fact that they are not independent surveyors, but a contractor (one that is poorly reviewed at that). We are concerned that we will receive a sales person prospecting for work and commission, rather than the advice of an independent surveyor, which will likely suggest unnecessary works and potentially hold us to ransom.
We therefore suggest that **** employ a PCA registered independent surveyor to carry out the survey. We understand that the costs of employing such a surveyor would be around £200, and as a gesture of goodwill, and to ensure a fair and accurate survey, we would be more than happy to cover this cost ourselves."
So its not just the fact that there might be damp. it the attitude and the patronising way they write. basically saying weve done something stupid and completely rejecting our choice of surveyor. naughty us.
Talk about sensitive. Poor you :rotfl:.
I dont see anything in that to get offended over indeed its bang on, measured and courteous.
OP, YOU are at fault. They are taking a careful and measure attitude and you are being a d**k.
If I was your seller I'd drop you like a hot potato who knows what other things you'll get offended over, or take completely the wrong end of the stick.0 -
4 viewing and measured up for curtains, and now wanting surveys.
Vendor right to be steering these FTB in the right direction.0 -
The mortgage provider is almost always only interested in a valuation, it is rare for them to request anything more detailed.
All the lender is interested in is whether they can recoup the balance of the loan, in the event the borrower stops making their repayments, and does the property represent suitable security for the loan.
Unless thier valuation informs them that there could be damp, woodworm, decay etc. Then they want PCA accredited surveys done.0 -
OP unlikely to return I feel!
Rare to have such unanimous opinions.0 -
-
Unless thier valuation informs them that there could be damp, woodworm, decay etc. Then they want PCA accredited surveys done.
Possibly, but still a rare occurrence imho. It would likely depend on the LTV of the loan concerned.
I cannot recall the last time a mortgage valuation report for a property I have dealt with contained an insistence that such surveys were carried out, it would be a few years ago.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards