We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can we stop employees from having direct contact?

Options
1356729

Comments

  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    I regret it already. She is screaming discrimination now so this has turned into something bigger than we expected. We just wanted her to stop messaging her colleagues directly.

    Just dismiss her then. She isnt working out. Its not a discriminatory reason. it is not constructive dismissal.

    Id also remind colleagues if they dont want people to contact them outside of work to not give their contact details until they are certain they want that person as a friend not a colleague, and if they do find them out, to block or ignore those people.

    You cant stop her sending daft messages, but the people receiving them can stop receiving them.

    unless you have said 'stop messaging people, only white/gay/old/transgender/disabled/female people can message', then its not discrimination
  • BorisThomson
    BorisThomson Posts: 1,721 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    We!!!8217;re a small family run company so we do enlist help to put policies together etc but day to day things we just manage ourselves. We thought this was a simple issue!

    The cost of proper advice would far outweigh the cost of defending a discrimination claim, whether that claim is successful or not.

    What type of discrimination is she claiming?
  • She has said it’s gender discrimination because she’s a female.
  • marliepanda
    marliepanda Posts: 7,186 Forumite
    She has said it’s gender discrimination because she’s a female.

    Have you told all the women not to?

    is she the only woman?
  • She!!!8217;s the only woman - we aren!!!8217;t a sexist organisation, it!!!8217;s just a very male dominated industry!
  • Carrot007
    Carrot007 Posts: 4,534 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Odd one.

    From the sounds of it she has done nothing wrong, just been friendly.

    I would suggest going back to her and saying you were just passing the message on from the other staff that they don't want you to contact them outside work and are sorry for how you phrased it.

    Of course then she will probably leave because everybody apparently hates her.
  • BorisThomson
    BorisThomson Posts: 1,721 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    She!!!8217;s the only woman - we aren!!!8217;t a sexist organisation, it!!!8217;s just a very male dominated industry!

    Now you understand the purpose of proper legal advice?
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I bet the complaints have come from some angry wives / GFs......
  • They don!!!8217;t hate her, they just wanted to stop the direct communication. Their wives probably aren!!!8217;t keen on them getting messages from a woman at work and I can appreciate how that might look.

    In hindsight it seems stupid that we would try and say she can only have direct contact with them if they invite her to. It!!!8217;s worded all wrong. !!!8220;Don!!!8217;t you call me, I!!!8217;ll call you!!!8221;. We were trying to make things easier on everyone
  • BorisThomson
    BorisThomson Posts: 1,721 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Carrot007 wrote: »
    Odd one.

    From the sounds of it she has done nothing wrong, just been friendly.

    I would suggest going back to her and saying you were just passing the message on from the other staff that they don't want you to contact them outside work and are sorry for how you phrased it.

    Of course then she will probably leave because everybody apparently hates her.

    And make a claim for victimisation.

    We don't know if she has a valid case or not, we don't know what she has said/ sent that has caused such offence, but it is clear that she has the upper hand because the employer has failed to manage the situation properly.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.