Sir Greg Knight's parking bill

System

pappa_golf wrote: »

"car park management*" now that is a joke! how can a ANPR camera manage a car park , you could park side on in a mother /child or disabled spot , you could block a shop entry , you could set up a car boot sale , what can a ANPR camera do?

Other than in the case of the car boot sale what could a parking attendant do? Nothing other than give you a stern look.

Kirchenmaus

beamerguy wrote: »

Let us hope that Sir Greg fully understands
the great IPC/IAS scam

If not, we'll end up with a single CoP and a single appeal body...the IAS!

--Kirchenmaus

Kite2010

Kirchenmaus wrote: »

If not, we'll end up with a single CoP and a single appeal body...the IAS!

--Kirchenmaus

The same IAS who must have approved a sign at Hayes & Harington station which proudly claims "NO GRACE PERIODS APPLY" in bigger writing than the rest of the rubbish :rotfl:.

At least the BPA has POPLA, than the secretive IPC appeals body

beamerguy

Kirchenmaus wrote: »

If not, we'll end up with a single CoP and a single appeal body...the IAS!

--Kirchenmaus

The IAS ????:rotfl::rotfl: NO

It is clear that the IAS/IPC is a scam, proven over and
over and over again

Sir Greg has already been told this

Ryandavis1959

Tarambor wrote: »

And what do you think the outcome of that would be? Do you think it would allow you unfettered access to private property to park on it as you please?

If I were a car park owner and that came into force two things would happen:

1) On the day it came into force a large fence would go up to deny anyone access.
2) On the second day it would be sold for redevelopment.

Congratulations, a hundred or more car parking spaces lost. Best of luck finding somewhere to park when all the other private car parks have decided to do the same.

It’s very simple, landowners should be forced to invest in barriers if they want to manage land. Pay on exit only. No ANPR, no option to give any PCN’s except for people who misuse disabled bays. No keeper details to be provided for ANY situation. This will provide car park spaces and ensure that the public are safe from predatory scumbags with PCN targets in high-vis.

Instead the government have decided to protect their buddies at Capita. The public once more lose out.

beamerguy

Ryandavis1959 wrote: »

It’s very simple, landowners should be forced to invest in barriers if they want to manage land. Pay on exit only. No ANPR, no option to give any PCN’s except for people who misuse disabled bays. No keeper details to be provided for ANY situation. This will provide car park spaces and ensure that the public are safe from predatory scumbags with PCN targets in high-vis.

Instead the government have decided to protect their buddies at Capita. The public once more lose out.

Well, that's a better idea than telling people to name
the driver ????

BUT .... the only dream world I am aware of that
would accept that is Walt Disney

When you are not at the benefits office, why not apply
to become the President of Scotland, The Donald may
help you, next thing is building a great big wall between
England and Scotland

The_Deep

It’s very simple, landowners should be forced to invest in barriers if they want to manage land

If Jezza gets his hands on the reins, landlords will be forced to do lots of things which will beggar up the market and cost tenants more.

Umkomaas

There’s nothing I’ve yet seen in the documentation surrounding all this that tackles the insidious ANPR camera monitoring (and all of its inaccuracies) and which suggests achieving parity between privately operated car parks and those in the public sector.

It just can’t be right - one overstay in a private car park is surely the same as an overstay in a local authority car park. When this Bill goes through its stages, I can’t believe that, at a very high level, local authorities won’t be doing some serious banging on the table!

fil_cad

This thread is a dam good read, but let's face it nothing will change ��

beamerguy

fil_cad wrote: »

This thread is a dam good read, but let's face it nothing will change ��

I rather feel it will and this is one good reason....

It's called Jacob Rees Mogg MP.

He is not the type of person who wants egg
on his face