Regular Saver Thread **New and Restarted**

ValiantSon

teddysmum wrote: »

The clue is the smiling face.

You say that, but not everyone uses it in the way that you imply.

xylophone

I suspect the post was just sightly tongue in cheek.

Could anybody really have imagined otherwise....well, perhaps not mc.....:)

ValiantSon

xylophone wrote: »

Could anybody really have imagined otherwise....well, perhaps not mc.....:)

Clearly they could, because I did. QED.

schiff

For those unused to the ways of this thread, the conversation currently ongoing is because people are bored out of their minds without the new Virgin to discuss.

Nobody seems to have entertained the possibility that there won't be one and that this is the end of an era. If in fact there isn't one, the depths to which people will go to fill the void are as yet unplumbed.

EachPenny

schiff wrote: »

For those unused to the ways of this thread, the conversation currently ongoing is because people are bored out of their minds without the new Virgin to discuss.

The regular savings equivalent of Braxton Hicks.

xylophone

Clearly they could, because I did. QED

But you said

I did wonder,

I'll have to be less subtle in future and use:rotfl:

or (and this'll be a first) "LOL"......

Wheres_My_Cashback

ValiantSon wrote: »

Clearly they could, because I did. QED.

Only you :D

polymaff

ValiantSon wrote: »

Clearly they could, because I did. QED.

Wheres_My_Cashback wrote: »

Only you :D

Not so.

To me, is the polite, non-aggressive version of - the latter suggesting "you are a ????"

Of course, is sometimes used by "????"s

ValiantSon

Wheres_My_Cashback wrote: »

Only you :D

Which doesn't disprove what I said, and as I was thanked by another person for my post it would seem that you are wrong.

xylophone

To me, is the polite, non-aggressive version of

But perhaps not to others?