We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New car, won’t honour price!

Options
1235»

Comments

  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    Which number T&C do you think they will rely on?
  • Nobbie1967
    Nobbie1967 Posts: 1,667 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Section 2a and 2b appear to be idnticle unless I'm missing something and both imply that it is the buyer that has the ability to cancel the contract if the seller cannot deliver in time. Is this the clause that the dealer is relying on to cancel the contract, or is there a different clause?

    I'd agree with GM's earlier post that a one sided clause to allow the dealer to cancel the deal at any time would seems to be at odds with consumer law as it would result in an unbalanced contract unless it was merely to allow cancellation early on during the deal checking process.
  • rickf
    rickf Posts: 16 Forumite
    Its sections 9d. onwards that seems to apply.
  • 9d refers to changes in the manufacturer's list price rather than discounts or other incentives offer by the dealer.

    If I am reading the first line of clause 9 correctly it seems to suggest they have the right to sell the car and then require it to be returned to them provided the ask within seven days. Given the poor drafting and that it is a consumer contract I am skeptical that clause would be enforecable.
  • rickf
    rickf Posts: 16 Forumite
    Yeah I can’t remember what I read that made me think it said they have the right to withdraw. The first half of it seems to be about used cars. Crappy general terms. Will bring that up with them.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    rickf wrote: »
    Thanks for the replies. I’m still unsure what to say after stating the legal stance, as they will come back to the fact they can withdraw, they’ve already mentioned it!

    If I say I’m in my right to claim damages etc they’ll call my bluff.. traders usually do in such situations, knowing that most won’t go to court.
    I still believe you have a strong legal case.

    However, as youu say, they may well call your bluff.

    You then have to decide whether to accept the losses, or call their bluff in return by sending a "Letter Before Action" followed by legal action,
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,175 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 16 December 2017 at 3:27AM
    Bought a new car, which probably cost more, instead of just paying the £200 to fix old car while waiting for new car to be built?

    Strange.

    What were you going to do with the old new car had you got the new car? :rotfl:

    But yeah, dealer sounds like a scum bag. Probably found a buyer who is offering more money for it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.