Would you buy a house without a bath??

cloo

I'd always want a bath, so would only consider a house without one if one could easily be put back in or the whole place would need major re-doing anyway.

red_devil

yes we would we had our bath removed.

red_devil

baths are horrible sitting in your own dirt and the water goes cold quickly as well, plus it takes ages.

Chrysalis

I am a bath person so no.

Although I suppose there is nothing stopping a buyer getting a bath fitted, which is what my sister did in her house.

robatwork

Fact is you have about a 50/50 split.

That means removing your bath would rule out half the market.

katejo

I wouldn't buy a house without a bath (or room for one) even though I mostly use the shower. I visited a local house last week and noticed that the bath wasn't full length. It could only be used sitting up. I wouldn't buy that either.

Spacie22

Another no vote here. I wouldn't like "space for a bath" either . I'd want a nice relaxing soak after a hard day moving house. (My other deal breaker is washing machines in the living room)

Dealied

Nah.The bathroom is really essential, even if it's combined with the toilet room. At least a decent one.

newfoundglory

I had a flat that had a large shower unit only which was the size of a bath. Really convenient and easy to walk in. Felt luxury too.

Now got a house with a bath that has a shower head. Not as convenient and almost had several accidents getting in and out.

I would stick with a shower unit only, but I know plenty of people that wouldn't.

DCFC79

As long as there is room to put 1 yes I would buy a house without a bath, Ive not seen a house with just a shower on Zoopla and Rightmove.