MIL COLLECTIONS please help

Blakes2017

Hi Can someone please help me

I have received a letter from “MIL collections” dated 6/10/17 stating further action -
MIL claiming I have 7 days to pay an unpaid charge of £100 for parking in the wrong bay on private land , then I have another letter dated 12/10/17 which is from car park management services stating they have sold their interest in the debt to MIL , I am not sure what to do from here , up until now I have ignored any letters from this car pArk management services & zenith collections , and now i have received the letter from MIL collections saying I need to pay them £100 or further action will be taken , please could you advise on what I should do ,

Many thanks

Umkomaas

Debt collector letter - ignore (see NEWBIES FAQ sticky, post #4). Come back if you get a LBC/LBA/LBCCC or real court papers.

Blakes2017

Hi I have now has a letter before action , It says they are giving me notice that they are preparing to recover the suns die and Costa via a small claims action within 14 days , then further down in bold it states “DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE LETTER YOU MAY NOT RECIEVW FURTHER COMMUNICATION FROM US PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A SMALL CLAIMS ACTION “ - im not sure what to do should I still be ignoring this ?

pappa_golf

the origional ticket from car park management services , did you ever reply to them , did you appeal , did you give them your full name and address ,

or

did car park management services get your info from the dvla

this is an important question , please answer

pappa_golf

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/mil-collections-fail-in-court-champerty.html

beamerguy

How can car park management services sell an unproven
debt ??
Unlike a proven bank loan as an example

Do MIL have all the evidence

As said, was it CPMS who obtained your data from the DVLA

DVLA confirm massive data protection breach to MIL Collections
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/dvla-confirm-massive-data-protection.html

Blakes2017

Hi when I found the original ticket I phoned up and disputed it , I never heard anything more , no I didn’t give them any details of mine , they obtained from DVLA

pappa_golf

"they obtained from DVLA"

in which case there is a serious problem , CPMS are banned from selling or assigning any case where details have been obtained from the DVLA

most MIL cases came to a stop a few months ago , hower there now seem to be a few trickling thru

the DVLA are not happy , nor the BPA , await people more clued up on MIL , as to next step ,

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/dvla-confirm-massive-data-protection.html

beamerguy

And to the OP ...

"DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE LETTER YOU MAY NOT RECIEVW FURTHER COMMUNICATION FROM US PRIOR TO ISSUE OF A SMALL CLAIMS ACTION “

This is rubbish ... it's not serious, IT'S A SCAM

First step is to request from the DVLA the date your data
was accessed and by which company.

The DVLA is required to tell you.

Then come back here. In the meantime, do not be sucked
in by the paragraph above

pappa_golf

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/parking-awareness-services-to-pay-400.html


they play dirty , so do you , get the info from the DVLA , fight MIL , forwarn them that the are party to a DPA breach , chances are they will back off or not attend , then you hit CPMS with a claim under data protection acy , for selling your info when specifically banned by the DVLA for this

you may as well get D Dunsford involved as well ,

fight the !!!!!!s back , hit emm hard

pappa_golf

and a nice snippet http://notomob.co.uk/discussions/index.php?topic=6016.0


(another IPC company) The IPC released this statement about their operator Northwest Parking Enforcement.

Further to your complaint that Northwest Parking Enforcement is in breach of their KADOE contract with the DVLA by engaging Mil Collections to enforce their parking charges under the terms of a debt-purchase arrangement.

We have made the necessary enquiries with the DVLA who have clarified there had been a misinterpretation of the terms of the contract and that subsequently Mil collections should not be considered a ‘sub-contractor’ under it. The company would therefore be required to obtain the prior consent of the DVLA in order to engage in such an arrangement irrespective of whether they retained a significant degree of control over the data in question.

Accordingly, the arrangement that was in place may have put the operator in breach of the KADOE contract but this is limited to cases where the data was requested under the terms of the KADOE contract. It should be noted that this does not apply where the information was obtained or confirmed through other means.

Since the point has been clarified, we have been informed that the company is no longer referring keeper data that has been obtained under the KADOE contract to Mil collections and, as such, this issue should not arise in the future.


OK , the IPC accept the DVLA ruling , so why are they allowing another member to do this ??

if they were contactable , you could ask therm , (pigs will fly)