Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brexit, the economy and house prices part 5

16126136156176181111

Comments

  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,951 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Provided any action is decided democratically there would be no need, it is the blatant disregard for democracy that rankles so many.

    Definitely. Our democratically elected representatives should do what's best for the country, or seek opinion from the public.

    Or do you reckon that a 51.9/48.1 vote once, and then ignoring opinion, is the only democracy that's allowed?

    If the "will of the people" turns out to be bad for almost all of them, should we ignore democracy and press on anyway?
  • studentguy
    studentguy Posts: 188 Forumite

    Well I often hear the same people complaining about BBC bias on both sides of the debate, so I'd imagine that means they're pretty equal.

    Pretty fair analysis I think: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2016/07/05/was-the-bbc-biased-over-brexit/
    Despite my name, I'm not a student any more
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Definitely. Our democratically elected representatives should do what's best for the country, or seek opinion from the public.

    Or do you reckon that a 51.9/48.1 vote once, and then ignoring opinion, is the only democracy that's allowed?

    If the "will of the people" turns out to be bad for almost all of them, should we ignore democracy and press on anyway?

    You could argue that the opinion of the public was sought in 2016 and is still in the process of being acted upon.
    I’d be interested to know what has happened subsequently as regards a democratic steer from the public to suggest a change in direction.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,666 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Tromking wrote: »
    I’d be interested to know what has happened subsequently as regards a democratic steer from the public to suggest a change in direction.

    Theresa May asked for a bigger majority in the general election to deliver brexit, she ended up having to pay the DUP to keep her in power. That is a bit of a hint.....
  • Moby
    Moby Posts: 3,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    https://institute.global/news/tony-blairs-speech-european-policy-centre Lays it all out. Anyone supporting brexit now is undermining our future.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Herzlos wrote: »
    Definitely. Our democratically elected representatives should do what's best for the country, or seek opinion from the public.

    Or do you reckon that a 51.9/48.1 vote once, and then ignoring opinion, is the only democracy that's allowed?

    If the "will of the people" turns out to be bad for almost all of them, should we ignore democracy and press on anyway?
    How do you think a member of Parliament for a constituency that voted overwhelmingly for brexit should behave.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    phillw wrote: »
    Theresa May asked for a bigger majority in the general election to deliver brexit, she ended up having to pay the DUP to keep her in power. That is a bit of a hint.....

    Remind me what other parties were saying in that election.
  • Theophile
    Theophile Posts: 295 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary
    ukcarper wrote: »
    How do you think a member of Parliament for a constituency that voted overwhelmingly for brexit should behave.
    MP's should act in the interest of their constituents.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 1 March 2018 at 4:39PM
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Remind me what other parties were saying in that election.

    Labour - A 'jobs first' Brexit with less of the extremism of the Tories, while hinting at being open to a variety of future relationships with the EU

    SNP - Stay in the single market and customs union

    Lib Dems - Stay in the EU via 2nd referendum


    Regardless - Now Labour has denounced May's Brextremist 'red lines', come out and publicly backed staying in the CU and staying close to the EU.

    They still lead in the polls.;)
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,951 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    ukcarper wrote: »
    How do you think a member of Parliament for a constituency that voted overwhelmingly for brexit should behave.

    They should vote in the best interests of their constituency and country. Address their underlying concerns rather than just what they are asking for.
    Tromking wrote: »
    I’d be interested to know what has happened subsequently as regards a democratic steer from the public to suggest a change in direction.
    1. Almost all of the Leave campaign promises being back tracked on or being outright lies.
    2. Tories losing their strong majority on a brexit platform
    3. It starting to become clearer what Brexit means
    4. Polling showing the numbers shifting further towards remain.

    With such a narrow (statistically insignificant) "win" for Leave, the number of voters changing their mind to change the will of the people is tiny.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.