Brexit, the economy and house prices (Part 3)

A_Medium_Size_Jock

Theophile wrote: »

Actually leaving would be necessary to assess the actual impact of leaving. And as you said...

Wrong.

a VOTE to leave would represent an immediate ...

Immediate.
Not "immediately upon leaving" or any other terminology, just "immediate".
And our employment is still at a record high.

Do you plan on answering my earlier question or are you avoiding that too?
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=73115107&postcount=78

System

Hasn't this argument been done to death? i.e. the sun rose on the 24th June 2016 therefore Brexit will be just great. Or, there hasn't been an exodus of bankers therefore there won't be after brexit.

Conrad

Moby wrote: »

the future will be about economic zones not single countries.

Mate that sounds so under-grad.

This is another example of clunky linear thinking by Remainers and why you were susceptible to fear stories.

WHAT HAPPENED TO MASSIVE CITY JOB LOSSES, HRING IS BOOMING;

The City rebuffs Brexit recruitment worries with the number of jobs up by nearly a third in August


http://www.cityam.com/271798/city-rebuffs-brexit-recruitment-worries-number-jobs-up

A_Medium_Size_Jock

Arklight wrote: »

What is it you think you won?

Perhaps the opposite to that which Herzlos says you have all lost?
Maybe ask him?

A_Medium_Size_Jock

Maybe the newbie poster missed that in the morass of previous threads & posts?
:whistle:

Theophile

A_Medium_Size_Jock wrote: »

And our employment is still at a record high.

That's good news. Maybe because...

A_Medium_Size_Jock wrote: »

we have not left yet.

?

System

Piece from the FT about how a farmer is dealing with a shortage of labour - by giving their Polish workers pay rises and plans to move away from labour intensive crops.

https://www.ft.com/content/0e0a77f2-96df-11e7-b83c-9588e51488a0

Tromking

Arklight wrote: »

What is it you think you won?

I think he means he's trashed your world view and set in train a sequence of events that equates to a complete change in the political and economic direction of a country.
In short, he`s handed yer ar*e to you on a plate.:)

Conrad

ilovehouses wrote: »

Piece from the FT about how a farmer is dealing with a shortage of labour - by giving their Polish workers pay rises and plans to move away from labour intensive crops.

https://www.ft.com/content/0e0a77f2-96df-11e7-b83c-9588e51488a0

If you'd listened carefully many months ago we said Brexit was in part a cry of desperation from those at the bottom and how Brexit could help stem immigration and force farmers and others to pay more. Also said UK firms would have to start training yooof again.


For my pains I kept getting told I was a dreamer about 'Tigers milking goats'.




Your piece highlights the 'change breads innovation' point I've made.

A_Medium_Size_Jock

Theophile wrote: »

That's good news. Maybe because...

?

You really do not understand what "immediate" means?

immediate
ɪˈmiːdɪət/
adjective
adjective: immediate

1. 1.
   occurring or done at once; instant.
   "the authorities took no immediate action"
   synonyms:instant, instantaneous, on-the-spot, prompt, swift, speedy, rapid, quick, expeditious; Moresudden, hurried, hasty, precipitate, abrupt;
   lightning, whirlwind, overnight;
   informalsnappy, p.d.q. (pretty damn quick);
   literaryfleet, rathe;
   rarealacritous
   "the UN resolution called for immediate action"

Okay.

A_Medium_Size_Jock wrote: »

Wrong.

Immediate.
Not "immediately upon leaving" or any other terminology, just "immediate".
And our employment is still at a record high.

Do you plan on answering my earlier question or are you avoiding that too?
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=73115107&postcount=78