Fight the French

TrickyWicky

Guys_Dad wrote: »

fred246 wrote: »

It's all part of the Tories plan to shut the NHS down. Under fund it so it can't provide the services that people want. So get the public unhappy. Don't pay the staff so get the staff unhappy. Why are pensioners guaranteed a minimum pay rise of 2.5% every year but NHS workers get a maximum pay rise of 1%? I think the Tories want some NHS strikes so they can say "look it's not working, we need privatization".

What a small minded comment.

Actually to be fair Guys Dad I found myself thinking very similar thoughts very quickly.

The tories are known to be privatising everything, the NHS is the last major public service left and health care is always worth mega money.

What better than to destroy the NHS from within? Plant the poisonous seeds of doubt and the staff themselves will destroy it from within and spread the poison. Next thing you know its a failing service just like british rail... and it can only be fixed via privatisation.

It's all about strategy. The tories know how to use strategies to their advantage... well they did until TM took the helm..

Cygnus_Alpha

Half_way wrote: »

blah blah blah commercial confidentially at a guess.

Commercial confidentiality in itself is not an exemption under FOI. They would have to explain or demonstrate a significant negative consequence of the disclosure - which in itself would be quite interesting.

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-freedom-of-information/refusing-a-request/

beamerguy

TrickyWicky wrote: »

Actually to be fair Guys Dad I found myself thinking very similar thoughts very quickly.

The tories are known to be privatising everything, the NHS is the last major public service left and health care is always worth mega money.

What better than to destroy the NHS from within? Plant the poisonous seeds of doubt and the staff themselves will destroy it from within and spread the poison. Next thing you know its a failing service just like british rail... and it can only be fixed via privatisation.

It's all about strategy. The tories know how to use strategies to their advantage... well they did until TM took the helm..

It may happen but it will take years and years ahead
Until then they have to keep topping up the NHS from the magic money tree

When the NHS was born, it was assumed that the max people
would live was three score years and ten .... max

Now we have a mega ageing population with mega costs involved
and not enough people paying into the system at the bottom.

The NHS is a prime Multi Level Marketing operation with not enough
people at the bottom to support those at the top of the chain.

As the note which was left by the previous government said
"We have no money left" ???

It is bording on implosion

pappa_golf

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-40628560

henrik777

The_Deep wrote: »

DJ Coates Does NOT UNDERSTAND THE SCAM

If a judge does not understand the law then a mistrial should be declared. If a few hundred/thousand people complain to their M.Ps about this decision it will, one hopes, force the DOJ to review the case.

If this is her

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/BWN7N7C1yLqfkK8-AvB6sd9tgf4/appointments

she specialises in family law and conveyancing. I doubt very much that she is familiar with the tricks PPCs get up to. I cannot see this judgement holding.

You think judges know the laws of every civil case in front of them ? :rotfl:

Each party gets to put evidence and legal arguments before the judge and it's up to them to make sure they place enough of the correct information to let the judge make the correct decision.

If the judge makes an error then you can appeal. Errors can be anything from a misunderstanding through to bias.

Ryandavis1959

The Lay Rep who many are blaming for this outcome has come out with a statement on the Parking Prankster blog:

Actually, Sue, I wasn't conducting Mr Dadswell's case, I only acted as his Lay rep. Mr Dadswell was provided with, and submitted, all of the relevant evidence before his March hearing; this documentation was provided by a Bargepole, well known of this parish.

Additionally, didn't the same Bargepole write both of Mr Beavis's clients skeletons, and didn't he and Mr Beavis decide not to have his clients give evidence?

There seems to be some sort of myth that I was involved in all 78 cases - I wasn't, my company was involved in one for which I was asked, by you, to Ley rep, I was a lay rep for another that was adjourned, and I assisted with a set aside in a third. But that was it - I didn't write any of the documents, I didn't conduct the case, I merely represented one of the clients.

Also, for the record, if I hadn't asked Mr Dadswell to sack me, I would have had to excuse myself as my interest in being joined as a party for costs is in clear conflict to Mr Dadswell's interest. Despite this, my company has refuded Mr Dadswell's fees, and we have ourselves paid out over £750 in expenses to support TEPAG and our customer.

However, as my conduct has not been determined by the court as having been unreasonable, as this is not being heard until 1 September, it's a bit premature for anyone to be accusing me of anything, including a barrister in open court reciting the lies of ZZPS.

It is worth noting that consideration is being made as to whether at least one witness will be reported for perjury - can anyone guess who?

Publicly, I will say this - if I am found liable in Unreasonable Conduct, I will absorb the entire costs bill personally. I will also, having been joined, be appealing the judgment on four grounds, including one of the points which the Judge says was argued unreasonably.

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/judgment-on-12-million-of-outstanding.html?m=1#comment-form

Ryandavis1959

I have been asked to remove this post, so I am doing.

pappa_golf

Ryandavis1959 wrote: »

The big news is that he confirms that he will definitely appeal SO THE NURSES CAN GET JUSTICE!

HE, as in singular?

Coupon-mad

Does anyone else understand the nuances in the above two posts?

Nope, is it just me...time will tell.

Ryandavis1959

I have been asked to remove this post, so I have.