Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fight the French
Comments
-
Dr C makes a point but what people are glossing over is that the "tariff" price on the parking charges is £20. At issue is the £100 + in "costs" that are being added on.
Most staff could cope with £20 (£10 if paid early) but the court case was not about the basis of the tickets but the amounts that can be loaded onto them.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Engaging a PPC to issue penalties like confetti is not one of these. Doesn't address any fundamental.
Yes and no, I guess.
It doesn't directly solve the issue which is lack of capacity. However, it does ensure:
Patients don't park in the staff spaces (and vice-versa)
Peoplevpark in designated spaces and not all over the site potentially blocking access
Revenue is obtained for the hospital - probably essential when funding is so tight.
Anyway back on topic. Good luck to my colleagues in Cardiff. It sounds like they've been badly advised and I hope they can raise funds for an appeal if the judgement is defective.0 -
What? From Indigo?Revenue is obtained for the hospital - probably essential when funding is so tight.
The court case outcome (extrapolated) suggests that Indigo could be in line for a £12m+ windfall. How much of that will go to fund vital organ transplants, chemotherapy treatments, joint replacements et al?
Or will it be simply lavished on even more foie gras and Crystal?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 264K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards