We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Does an illegal plate circumvent average speed cameras?
Comments
- 
            
I have two trailers and a caravan, plus two bike racks with lighting boards. Any of these could be towed/carried by one of two cars. I have several spare number plates with appropriate fixings, but it's a proper ballache swapping them over for short trips. I'm not surprised that some people don't bother.On a similar note I see many trailers with the wrong plate on - i.e. it does not match the towing vehicle. Today I saw a huge trailer with no plate. What happens when they pass a camera?
Perhaps a better system would be for all trailers to have a separate registration of their own, with a unique number which stays with the trailer all its life?If someone is nice to you but rude to the waiter, they are not a nice person.0 - 
            IanMSpencer wrote: »It intrigues me how many of the drivers I see deliberately driving at more than 57mph through a 50 actually understand the system, or am I just watching someone with cloned plates or a deliberately wrongly registered car.
A colleague recently brought his post to work and opened it as we all had our morning coffee. One was a fine for driving too fast in a average speed section of the motorway. He genuinely thought he hadn't done anything wrong because it was late and all the roadworkers would have gone home.
Another colleague then passed on some wisdom - change lanes after each camera and it can't track you.0 - 
            
 - 
            
Not so much an urban myth, as an outdated truth. They didn't use to be permitted to - the type-approval for the cameras didn't allow it originally, but it has for nearly a decade now.Ebe_Scrooge wrote: »AdrianC is correct - this is an oft-circulated urban myth.0 - 
            
According to the makers of the SPECS system, both data and images are logged.AndyMc..... wrote: »There's no photo on average speed cameras.
See jenoptik.co.uk0 - 
            Perhaps a better system would be for all trailers to have a separate registration of their own, with a unique number which stays with the trailer all its life?
This is how it works in the US, at least in California. A much better system, imho, though you do have to pay a licence fee each year for the trailer, the amount depending on its value.I used to think that good grammar is important, but now I know that good wine is importanter.0 - 
            
It's how it works in much of Europe, too.iolanthe07 wrote: »Perhaps a better system would be for all trailers to have a separate registration of their own, with a unique number which stays with the trailer all its life?
This is how it works in the US, at least in California. A much better system, imho, though you do have to pay a licence fee each year for the trailer, the amount depending on its value.
The obvious follow-on is MOTs for trailers. Sounds like a damn good plan to me.0 - 
            trailers are tested now0
 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
