We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fuel efficiency remapping

Options
145679

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ah, go on. You can do it. Three contentless personal attacks in a row, all completely avoiding the actual subject because you know you're just blustering without facts...

    Yes, a last publicly-available figure for Viezu (quite probably the largest of the companies you named) of £2.2m turnover and 14 employees does (...just...) count as multi-million if we're being strictly pedantic. I will cheerfully acknowledge that. Some of that turnover and some of those employees will, of course, be involved in their aftermarket wheel, tyre and bodykit business rather than the remapping.

    Do you honestly think it really justifies your original statement, though...?
    motorguy wrote: »
    Dont for one minute assume that remapping companies are all two blokes in a shed.

    Try having a look at DMS Automotive, Superchips, Evolution Chips, Bluefin - all multi million pound companies and often supplying remaps worldwide.

    As for the last one of the three you originally named, Evolution Chips - well, they're even smaller than DMS, although they do at least have a positive net worth.
    https://www.duedil.com/company/07258521/motorsport-developments-blackpool-limited
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 March 2017 at 1:08PM
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Ah, go on. You can do it. Three contentless personal attacks in a row, all completely avoiding the actual subject because you know you're just blustering without facts...

    Yes, a last publicly-available figure for Viezu (quite probably the largest of the companies you named) of £2.2m turnover and 14 employees does (...just...) count as multi-million if we're being strictly pedantic. I will cheerfully acknowledge that. Some of that turnover and some of those employees will, of course, be involved in their aftermarket wheel, tyre and bodykit business rather than the remapping.

    Do you honestly think it really justifies your original statement, though...?


    As for the last one of the three you originally named, Evolution Chips - well, they're even smaller than DMS, although they do at least have a positive net worth.
    https://www.duedil.com/company/07258521/motorsport-developments-blackpool-limited

    Multi million pound [turnover] companies. You do grasp the concept dont you?

    And all things considered, and relative to this thread, WHAT DOES IT REALLY MATTER?

    Big players like BT have documented, auditable proof across a fleet of 22,000 vans - theres a fuel efficiency saving to be made with the right remap.

    The O/P now has that information and can pursue it if they so desire.
    • You said it was nigh on impossible for a power increase to improve MPG
    • You sneered that "a man and his wife" working from a shed could know more than the car manufacturers and you've now been given actual proof that it can and is being done.
    • You sneered at people on here with between us decades of experience using remaps and tuning boxes and confirming efficiency gains and you said we were all wrong.
    • You sneered that some of us have talked to businesses who confirmed a fuel efficiency with a remap, saying they were wrong too.

    All now disproven.

    You're now trying to deflect how wrong you are by clutching at the straw of semantics of the size of some of these organisations. The thread was never about that.

    Why cant you just admit you were wrong?
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    motorguy wrote: »
    Multi million pound turnover companies. You do grasp the concept dont you?

    A lot better, it seems, than some.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Ah, go on. You can do it. Three contentless personal attacks in a row, all completely avoiding the actual subject because you know you're just blustering without facts...

    Yes, a last publicly-available figure for Viezu (quite probably the largest of the companies you named) of £2.2m turnover and 14 employees does (...just...) count as multi-million if we're being strictly pedantic. I will cheerfully acknowledge that. Some of that turnover and some of those employees will, of course, be involved in their aftermarket wheel, tyre and bodykit business rather than the remapping.

    Do you honestly think it really justifies your original statement, though...?


    As for the last one of the three you originally named, Evolution Chips - well, they're even smaller than DMS, although they do at least have a positive net worth.
    https://www.duedil.com/company/07258521/motorsport-developments-blackpool-limited

    There you go - i've added the subtext that everyone else understood but you didnt.
    motorguy wrote: »
    Dont for one minute assume that remapping companies are all two blokes in a shed.

    Try having a look at DMS Automotive, Superchips, Evolution Chips, Bluefin - all multi million pound turnover companies and often supplying remaps worldwide.

    One word, and you're now basing all your argument on it.

    :rolleyes:
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AdrianC wrote: »
    A lot better, it seems, than some.

    Clearly not.

    So are you going to admit you were so wrong about remapping not being able to approve fuel efficiency?
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 March 2017 at 1:34PM
    motorguy wrote: »
    There you go - i've added the subtext that everyone else understood but you didnt.

    Oh, I did, thanks. The difference is that I understand what those financials represent.
    One word, and you're now basing all your argument on it.

    :rolleyes:
    Umm, so we've found precisely one remapper (who target the corporate fleet market) that JUST squeeks into that category (albeit including their wheel/tyre/bodykit business). And then there's all the ones you actually name checked, none of whose financials look like they're anywhere near. One of them's barely solvent, from the few details we can see. Because, of course, they're all trading under total exemptions from having to submit full accounts to CoHo, since their balance sheets are all <£3m and turnovers <£6m.

    But getting back to the whole point of this - Yes, they all have the facilities and resources to improve upon the work of the OEMs' own massive internal development teams, absolutely they do. Of course. Christ, two-thirds of the businesses you name-checked have net worths below even the list price of a single Mondeo.

    BTW, which of the brands do you supply?
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Oh, I did, thanks. The difference is that I understand what those financials represent.

    Umm, so we've found precisely one remapper (who target the corporate fleet market) that JUST squeeks into that category (albeit including their wheel/tyre/bodykit business). And then there's all the ones you actually name checked, none of whose financials look like they're anywhere near. One of them's barely solvent, from the few details we can see. Because, of course, they're all trading under total exemptions from having to submit full accounts to CoHo, since their balance sheets are all <£3m and turnovers <£6m.

    But getting back to the whole point of this - Yes, they all have the facilities and resources to improve upon the work of the OEMs' own massive internal development teams, absolutely they do. Of course. Christ, two-thirds of the businesses you name-checked have net worths below even the list price of a single Mondeo.

    BTW, which of the brands do you supply?

    For the avoidance of doubt, are you now admitting you were wrong about remapping not being able to improve fuel efficiency, given the now overwhelming evidence?
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,845 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Did you notice their net assets figure?

    I did, but I don't see how it's relevant. They have about £1m in assets and £800k in liabilites. They'd still need a multi-million £ turnover to sustain that. Ergo they are a multi-million pound company. Do you disagree?
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 March 2017 at 1:48PM
    motorguy wrote: »
    For the avoidance of doubt, are you now admitting you were wrong about remapping not being able to improve fuel efficiency, given the now overwhelming evidence?
    No, I'm being sarcastic. I apologise for assuming you would be able to tell that, given the context of that sentence.
    Herzlos wrote: »
    I did, but I don't see how it's relevant. They have about £1m in assets and £800k in liabilites. They'd still need a multi-million £ turnover to sustain that. Ergo they are a multi-million pound company. Do you disagree?

    Yes. All they'd need is a mortgage on their premises, or other long-term finance.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 March 2017 at 1:56PM
    AdrianC wrote: »
    No, I'm being sarcastic. I apologise for assuming you would be able to tell that, given the context of that sentence.



    Yes. All they'd need is a mortgage on their premises, or other long-term finance.

    So are you going to admit you were wrong about remapping not being able to improve fuel efficiency, given the now overwhelming evidence?

    This is like shooting fish in a barrel now....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.