We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Not in proper control of vehicle

12345679»

Comments

  • Car_54 wrote: »
    No. If he refused to answer, they would probably have cautioned him, which includes "... it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court."

    They should have done that as soon as they pointed out the offence to him.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They should have done that as soon as they pointed out the offence to him.

    Only if they wanted to use his answers in evidence.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.