We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Eye - Lying on evidence to POPLA
Comments
-
David Dunford is the DVLA Data Sharing manager.
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/david-dunford-172a8862
Always good to put a (young) face to a name!
John Gallagher is the POPLA Lead Adjudicator.
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/john-gallagher-63880543
Apologies, got them mixed up, thanks for correcting Umkomaas.0 -
Just wanted to say thanks for all the help with this and for pushing me on!0
-
I can't find the contact details on the other post - does anyone have them to hand?0
-
You could reset it by naming a driver, but there'd be no point, just let them take it to court where you can destroy them and claim costs.
Plus, you should look at making a claim against PE for breach of the DPA; since they misused your personal data by applying for it when not valid.
Remove any text where you're even implying who the driver is, as parking companies are often looking on here; it's suffice to note that the keeper wasn't the driver.0 -
I can't find the contact details on the other post - does anyone have them to hand?
depends whose details you are after, the simplest way being to put their name (like DUNFORD) into the forum search box , like I did
finding his was easy
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5590956
and for john gallagher , lead adjudicator at popla , use the popla email and make sure it says that it must go to john gallagher , the lead adjudicator , like this person did
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5535294
(where I put the search word GALLAGHER into the forums search box)
ie:- use the technology to find what you want0 -
Thanks, i was actually after the press contacts and did search the forum with no luck0
-
check the coupon-mad posts as I am sure she has condensed them into one long post for somebody else recently , plus its in post #31 in that thread too
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/55833070 -
Just sent this to complaints at popla.co.uk
Dear Mr Gallagher,
The handling of my case raises serious concerns over the impartiality, processes and competence of POPLA and these need to be addressed to maintain its reputation.
I have submitted clear evidence that the signs are currently covered up. If ParkingEye or yourselves would visit the site they could see this for themselves, alternatively you could contact the Health Centre directly and ask a member of staff to walk out to the car park and check!
The first image that i sent through as evidence you have disregarded because it was not date stamped. First, no where on your website does it state that photo's should be date stamped. Your website simply states "photographs (if you think the signage was inadequate)". I know there is no time stamp on the image but every digital photo does have a time stamp its called an EXIF file which shows when the image was taken, so your verdict is wrong! It does have a time stamp. The ParkingEye time stamp could have very easily been added at anytime yet you have taken this as gospel.
When i was able to view the ParkingEye evidence (which is clearly wrong and misleading), i went back to the surgery and took more photo's. To help with the pictures i included a copy of the Days newspaper to truly show the correct date. This is clear evidence that the signs are still incorrect, yet again you have rejected this because "POPLA is not able to accept additional evidence submitted at this late stage so I have not taken these into account when making my decision.", my question is why? Why can't i submitted evidence which clearly points out that the images supplied by ParkingEye are incorrect. You have allowed my to comment on the ParkingEye evidence but only if it's text. Why am i only allowed to reply with writing and not additional images?
This whole situation is madness and some simple common sense would conclude that the signage is wrong.
I look forward to hearing your response.0 -
Just went to the car park again (I'm getting obsessed!) and the signs are still covered so I'm going to contact the local press today. Also tried out my new app which time stamps the images0
-
I've also emailed the health centre asking them to cancel it as well..... Two emails over to:
Neil Higginson, Practice Business Manager
Sophia Walcot-Earle, Practice General Manager
We will see what they say!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards