We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Smoking in hire car - fine
Options
Comments
-
-
BeenThroughItAll wrote: »On each of those occasions, actually, I did. I wasn't the hirer, I was travelling with the hirer, and between 2 and 11 others.0
-
BeenThroughItAll wrote: »On each of those occasions, actually, I did. I wasn't the hirer, I was travelling with the hirer, and between 2 and 11 others.
Your missing the point. You weren't a member of the public in This instance. You were in some way related to the hirer, either friend, family or colleague0 -
If you lease a car, long term, you're the registered keeper - not the case in a hire car.
Not sure I know the answer to this BTW, but I do know not to smoke in a hire car, not with any part of your body inside it.0 -
If it was hired for business use, then the laws on smoking in the workplace would apply.
Well on several occasions, the hire was personal for family events (it's my parents' 50th anniversary this year, so there's a few large family gatherings), and on others it's been business.
Ultimately, the point I'm making is that I, and several other members of the public, have had access to a vehicle not hired to us and used for various purposes.0 -
Your missing the point. You weren't a member of the public in This instance. You were in some way related to the hirer, either friend, family or colleague
How does being related to anyone, or working with them, stop me being a member of the public? I'm always a member of the public, as are the people I work with and my family. Sure, they're my colleagues or siblings/parents/etc, but they're still, also, member of the public.
If you're stating otherwise, then I'd be genuinely interested to see the Act which defines 'the Public' in statute - as I can't find it. Otherwise, precedent has to apply and I can't find that either, so the interpretation of Acts referencing 'the Public' is subjective in law.0 -
If you lease a car, long term, you're the registered keeper - not the case in a hire car.
Not sure I know the answer to this BTW, but I do know not to smoke in a hire car, not with any part of your body inside it.
Im not saying people should, more the civil contract vs criminal law aspect.0 -
BeenThroughItAll wrote: »How does being related to anyone, or working with them, stop me being a member of the public? I'm always a member of the public, as are the people I work with and my family. Sure, they're my colleagues or siblings/parents/etc, but they're still, also, member of the public.
If you're stating otherwise, then I'd be genuinely interested to see the Act which defines 'the Public' in statute - as I can't find it. Otherwise, precedent has to apply and I can't find that either, so the interpretation of Acts referencing 'the Public' is subjective in law.
When you enter a premises, you can wear 'many hats'.
(lets just exclude vehicles for the moment)
If you enter a pub, retails outlet, or anywhere where you are afforded a right of access - which is what you have in such areas, you are a member of the public. These areas are 'private', but you reasonably expect to access them freely during their opening hours. (you can include GPs, Hospitals, police stations, etc.)
There are also some areas where you pay to access, e.g. nightclubs, cinemas, etc. Where you pay for access, but again it's freely accepted that any member of the public can access, it's not restricted to individuals.
- A hire car is obviously restricted to the person hiring it, and anyone he individually invites to join. You couldn't just climb into a car. It's not a 'public' space, it's not open to the general public.
A comparison could be a rented property (I know its excluded for smoking anyway - I mean for the purposes of public access) it's not yours, but you are paying for it and decide who can and cant come in. You have exclusive use of the property.
That was my point. (im not saying im right, im saying that is the logic for my argument)0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards