We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Smoking in hire car - fine

Options
124678

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    cr1mson wrote: »
    The Smoke-free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007

    11.—(1) Subject to the following paragraphs of this regulation, an enclosed vehicle and any enclosed part of a vehicle is smoke-free if it is used—

    (a)by members of the public or a section of the public (whether or not for reward or hire)



    I could be wrong of course, but to me that reads the lieks of: buses, coaches etc. The public don't have access to a private hire car.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,837 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Guest101 wrote: »
    I could be wrong of course, but to me that reads the lieks of: buses, coaches etc. The public don't have access to a private hire car.

    Of course they do. They have to pay a fare to do so, but that's no different from a bus.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    Car_54 wrote: »
    Of course they do. They have to pay a fare to do so, but that's no different from a bus.



    I disagree, it's not a fare for exclusive hire and use of a vehicle when using a bus.


    I'd be interested in case law on this.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Guest101 wrote: »
    I could be wrong of course, but to me that reads the lieks of: buses, coaches etc. The public don't have access to a private hire car.
    With taxis, buses and coaches, smoking would be banned anyway, as it's the driver's workplace - in the same way as it's banned in pubs because it's the barstaff's workplace.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,837 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Guest101 wrote: »
    I disagree, it's not a fare for exclusive hire and use of a vehicle when using a bus.


    I'd be interested in case law on this.

    No need for case law. The Health Act 2006 (under which these regulations were made) is pretty clear:

    "Premises are 'open to the public' if the public or a section of the public has access to them, whether by invitation or not, and whether by payment or not."


  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    Car_54 wrote: »

    No need for case law. The Health Act 2006 (under which these regulations were made) is pretty clear:

    "Premises are 'open to the public' if the public or a section of the public has access to them, whether by invitation or not, and whether by payment or not."





    That's not clear in the slightest.


    Number one a vehicles is not a 'premises'
    Number two the public or a section of the public does not have access to hire vehicle
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    AdrianC wrote: »
    With taxis, buses and coaches, smoking would be banned anyway, as it's the driver's workplace - in the same way as it's banned in pubs because it's the barstaff's workplace.



    True enough, but the law is not always linear. Often there may be multiple section and acts for the same 'crime'.


    However, I think the length of the lease would come into it.
  • Guest101 wrote: »
    That's not clear in the slightest.


    Number one a vehicles is not a 'premises'
    Number two the public or a section of the public does not have access to hire vehicle

    I'm a member of the public, and I definitely remember having access to a hire vehicle at least seven or eight times this year alone.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,837 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Guest101 wrote: »
    That's not clear in the slightest.


    Number one a vehicles is not a 'premises'
    Number two the public or a section of the public does not have access to hire vehicle

    1. Possibly not, but it would be absurd to apply a different definition of "public" to a vehicle.

    I say possibly because the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 specifically defines "premises" to include "any vehicle, vessel, aircraft or hovercraft".

    2. Who do you imagine uses those thousands of hire vehicles if not the public? They have access "by payment" as per the Act.
  • Car_54 wrote: »
    1. Possibly not, but it would be absurd to apply a different definition of "public" to a vehicle.

    I say possibly because the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 specifically defines "premises" to include "any vehicle, vessel, aircraft or hovercraft".

    2. Who do you imagine uses those thousands of hire vehicles if not the public?
    They have access "by payment" as per the Act.
    Car_54 wrote: »

    No need for case law. The Health Act 2006 (under which these regulations were made) is pretty clear:

    "Premises are 'open to the public' if the public or a section of the public has access to them, whether by invitation or not, and whether by payment or not."





    So if you hire a car any member of the public has access to it?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.