We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Paid for app is now free 1 year later

I, along with several thousands more I suspect, paid £1.49 for a Fantasy Football app from "Premier League" for the 2015-2016 Barclays Premier League season. Recently I received an email from the developers announcing proudly that a new app is here and it is free. The existing app no longer connects to their service and is no longer listed in the app store. The new app has more features and so is not centered around the fantasy football game unlike the original app.

Is this legally allowed or should I be asking for my money back?
«13

Comments

  • glentoran99
    glentoran99 Posts: 5,825 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Debt-free and Proud!
    goku wrote: »
    I, along with several thousands more I suspect, paid £1.49 for a Fantasy Football app from "Premier League" for the 2015-2016 Barclays Premier League season. Recently I received an email from the developers announcing proudly that a new app is here and it is free. The existing app no longer connects to their service and is no longer listed in the app store. The new app has more features and so is not centered around the fantasy football game unlike the original app.

    Is this legally allowed or should I be asking for my money back?

    Well as the app was for 2015-16 you got what you paid for
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Really.....:rotfl:
  • WhyNot?
    WhyNot? Posts: 51 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    goku wrote: »
    I, along with several thousands more I suspect, paid £1.49 for a Fantasy Football app from "Premier League" for the 2015-2016 Barclays Premier League season. Recently I received an email from the developers announcing proudly that a new app is here and it is free. The existing app no longer connects to their service and is no longer listed in the app store. The new app has more features and so is not centered around the fantasy football game unlike the original app.

    Is this legally allowed or should I be asking for my money back?

    What an intriguing question you pose, goku.

    May I enquire as to why you would possibly consider this not to be legal?

    What if the app was not free this year, but was charged at £4.99?
    Following your logic, would you in that instance have suggested you still owed £3.50 for last years app?

    Just something for you to pomder over. However, I am not a lawyer and cannot give you legal advice; if you want that, may I suggest you seek independent legal advice of the issue. :)
  • goku wrote: »
    I, along with several thousands more I suspect, paid £1.49 for a Fantasy Football app from "Premier League" for the 2015-2016 Barclays Premier League season.
    You purchased something to be used for a set period of time and that time period has now expired.
    If you had bought a 2015/2016 season ticket to attend matches at the home stadium of your favourite football team, would you also expect that same ticket to allow you access during the 2016/2017 season?
  • You should ask for a million pounds in compensation....geez this country!
  • London50
    London50 Posts: 1,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Many, many years ago I bought a TIME pc and was told that with the 6GB harddrive I would never need to buy another pc. To date I have had to buy a couple of laptops/PC's with a min 1TB harddrive for the things I do online.
    Can I take that salesperson to court for not telling the truth as that pc cost over £200?? ;0)
  • goku
    goku Posts: 4 Newbie
    My original post alluded to the fact that I had bought the app just ahead of the 15/16 season. However, upon a closer look, the original app is indeed titled 15/16. I did assume that this app would simply continue for other seasons; as I didn't take the official title of the app into my assumption, I made this simple mistake.

    @WhyNot?: The avenue I was hoping to explore was along the lines of something I had read a long time ago where if the same product is released by a manufacturer, the original purchasers are entitled to the newer version for free. I believe this only applies to the exact same model; hence I think that would explain why you have several iterations of phones etc.
  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    McKneff wrote: »
    Nothing wrong with the country pal . I a pretty proud to be British. If you come from a different country , sod off back there if its so bad .

    Be careful ... you might find yourself getting a yellow card; some posters have delicate sensibilities ... they can dish it out but they can't take it. ;)
  • glentoran99
    glentoran99 Posts: 5,825 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Debt-free and Proud!
    goku wrote: »
    My original post alluded to the fact that I had bought the app just ahead of the 15/16 season. However, upon a closer look, the original app is indeed titled 15/16. I did assume that this app would simply continue for other seasons; as I didn't take the official title of the app into my assumption, I made this simple mistake.

    @WhyNot?: The avenue I was hoping to explore was along the lines of something I had read a long time ago where if the same product is released by a manufacturer, the original purchasers are entitled to the newer version for free. I believe this only applies to the exact same model; hence I think that would explain why you have several iterations of phones etc.

    Not sure where you have read that but its a height of nonsense
  • goku wrote: »
    @WhyNot?: The avenue I was hoping to explore was along the lines of something I had read a long time ago where if the same product is released by a manufacturer, the original purchasers are entitled to the newer version for free. I believe this only applies to the exact same model; hence I think that would explain why you have several iterations of phones etc.
    Surely if that was the case, no one would ever need to pay for newer versions of Windows operating system, Anti-virus software etc.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.