PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House Roof Colour Change without consent

Options
1246

Comments

  • glasgowdan
    glasgowdan Posts: 2,968 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The type of roof covering has implications for heat on sunny days, cost to replace, durability, appearance, ease of maintenance... just off the top of my head.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    robatwork wrote: »
    Lots of opinions on here and mine is in the "does make a substantive difference to the look of the house" camp - it's not purely cosmetic either.
    It IS purely cosmetic - it's not in any way functional.

    Whether it's a substantive cosmetic change or not is another question.
    glasgowdan wrote: »
    The type of roof covering has implications for heat on sunny days, cost to replace, durability, appearance, ease of maintenance... just off the top of my head.
    If it makes any tangible difference, then there are some serious breaches of building regs going on when it comes to loft insulation...
  • swishy87
    swishy87 Posts: 199 Forumite
    my contract specifically says '...a change to the property (which could mean a change to the design, construction or materials to be used in the property which would significantly and substantially alter the size, appearance or value) then we will formally consult you to obtain your agreement to those changes.' So in my case something like this I feel would be covered by this clause. But obviously like has been said we don't know what the OP's contract is.
  • Jon_B_2
    Jon_B_2 Posts: 832 Forumite
    500 Posts
    On the surface this seems pathetic, but to be honest - I think Mendip tiles look proper naff.
  • dobymicks
    dobymicks Posts: 97 Forumite
    I would be well peeved if the builder went ahead with such a substantial change without even consulting me. This has got to be wrong. They have taken the P*** here and they know it.

    If it was me I would be talking to my solicitor asking what can be done about it.

    Good luck OP.
    Don't let em grind you down.
  • Rodders53
    Rodders53 Posts: 2,675 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Mendip tiles come in a variety of colours, and finish; so it's possible they could have two different colours on adjacent houses without issue. https://www.marleyeternit.co.uk/Roofing/Concrete-Tiles/Mendip-Interlocking-Tile.aspx

    But you'll be very lucky to find the builder willing to change, now they are up...

    Seek legal advice from your conveyancing solicitor on where you stand.
  • TrickyDicky101
    TrickyDicky101 Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Was there a price differential between the slate and Mendip rooves before you agreed the sale?
  • They could put lead flashing up the middle and use this as a divider, then you can both have your preferred and agreed tiles.
    baldly going on...
  • teddysmum
    teddysmum Posts: 9,521 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Adjoining houses with very different tiles will look very odd.
  • AdrianC wrote: »
    It IS purely cosmetic - it's not in any way functional.

    Whether it's a substantive cosmetic change or not is another question.

    If it makes any tangible difference, then there are some serious breaches of building regs going on when it comes to loft insulation...
    Of course its not purely cosmetic. Its not in any way functional ??? The roof isn't functional? It keeps the rain out which is quite an important function, being a house n all.

    They've pulled a fast one here - slate is a more expensive covering and they've switched to tiles to do it on the cheap.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.