PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House Roof Colour Change without consent

Options
2456

Comments

  • swishy87
    swishy87 Posts: 199 Forumite
    AdrianC wrote: »
    On THIS one, as well? Then you're right. You've got no get-out at all.



    Honestly? You need to give yourself a bit of a slap around the chops as a wake-up call. You are starting to sound VERY precious here.

    They have. Read what you've signed. This will be within the variations that the contract allows, whether you understood that when you signed or not.

    I'm not so sure, I think we could get out of ours on this.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    swishy87 wrote: »
    I'm not so sure, I think we could get out of ours on this.
    Post the relevant clause(s).
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,113 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You haven't said what you want them to do to resolve it. Specifically, what actions would you like the builder to take?
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • swishy87
    swishy87 Posts: 199 Forumite
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Post the relevant clause(s).

    I don't have them with me right now but I know I questioned the solicitor around it.

    But it looks like the OP doesn't want to pull out either way, just wants them changed.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,113 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Even if they want to redo the tiles, which they clearly don't, if the red and black tiles don't interlock (not a builder, no idea if this is BS or not) then is it actually doable? Because if not, what are they expected to do about it?
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    elsien wrote: »
    Even if they want to redo the tiles, which they clearly don't, if the red and black tiles don't interlock (not a builder, no idea if this is BS or not) then is it actually doable? Because if not, what are they expected to do about it?
    If we're talking about a difference between slate and mendips, then - it's certainly not BS.

    Interlocking mendips - Marley%20Mendip%20Roof%20Tiles.JPG
    Flat slate - Slate-Roof-i.jpg

    Yes, the roof CAN be half-and-half, but there's going to be a big fat seam down the joint, and the difference will be FAR more marked long-term.

    No, I don't think it even vaguely realistic to expect the builder to strip a perfectly functional roof off because of the purely cosmetic difference.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It's entirely possible for two adjoined houses to have different tiles, it just takes a bit more work. You have to edge them both against a divider.

    I don't think you're going to have much luck. You will have to decide whether you want to
    A) Pull out of the purchase and get a refund on any money paid so far
    B) Go through with the purchase and put up with it.

    You won't be able to get them to change the tiles, they simply won't do it. There's nothing in it for them.

    If you try to take them to court the judge will likely say you should have pulled out of the purchase and dismiss the case.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • swishy87
    swishy87 Posts: 199 Forumite
    stator wrote: »
    It's entirely possible for two adjoined houses to have different tiles, it just takes a bit more work. You have to edge them both against a divider.

    I don't think you're going to have much luck. You will have to decide whether you want to
    A) Pull out of the purchase and get a refund on any money paid so far
    B) Go through with the purchase and put up with it.

    You won't be able to get them to change the tiles, they simply won't do it. There's nothing in it for them.

    If you try to take them to court the judge will likely say you should have pulled out of the purchase and dismiss the case.

    I agree, unfortunately it's either pull out with a refund (if you only knew about the change after exchange, not sure you could if you knew before exchange), or try and accept it (I do understand though as the apperance of a house is a big thing).
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,625 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Once you've completed you could pay a roofer to change them for you.

    You could then decide to sue for the costs of doing so.

    I personally doubt you would win, so you have to decide if the costs of making the change would be worth the lack of enjoyment of your property without the change.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • swishy87
    swishy87 Posts: 199 Forumite
    silvercar wrote: »
    Once you've completed you could pay a roofer to change them for you.

    You could then decide to sue for the costs of doing so.

    I personally doubt you would win, so you have to decide if the costs of making the change would be worth the lack of enjoyment of your property without the change.

    You would need permission from the developer to do this though and not sure they would let it happen in case it looked a mess.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.