Question ...

System

Have you check the Codes of Practice of the two ATA's?

pappa_golf

the BPA / IPC state that info cannot be passed on to any PARKING co that is not in a trade assoc


1: DRP/zenith ARE members of the BPA


2: joe blogs debt collection and solisitors are NOT parking Cos

beamerguy

IamEmanresu wrote: »

Have you check the Codes of Practice of the two ATA's?

I have, well not the IPC which is abused anyway by their members

The BPA make reference to warning drivers about court and debt collectors which assumes there is a debt and as more and more courts are dismissing these cases, the word debt needs to be proven.
Unfortunately, the BPA code of practice does not define the level of debt collection, the aggressive threatening letters and in particular the threat of a CCJ and the false representation of the "beavis case"

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

the BPA / IPC state that info cannot be passed on to any PARKING co that is not in a trade assoc


1: DRP/zenith ARE members of the BPA


2: joe blogs debt collection and solisitors are NOT parking Cos

Correct Pappa ..... to the parking company

pappa_golf

so , are you saying all debt collectors should have their dentures removed?


anyone , yup anyone inc the big thick bloke at my local can become a debt collector , however the government has set limits on what they * can do , those limits kick in and stop debt collectors starting court action




* fred at the pub can do what he likes , coz he,s a big bloke

System

You are confusing whether personal information can be transferred to other parties, their right to have that information lawfully, and whether the third parties talk !!!!!!!!.

With regards to the first, it is all set out in the CoP, plus other information that the ICO has.

As regards talking !!!!!!!!, there are plenty of experts here with a deep insight into that subject.

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

so , are you saying all debt collectors should have their dentures removed?

Funny :rotfl: thought as said they are all toothless

beamerguy

IamEmanresu wrote: »

You are confusing whether personal information can be transferred to other parties, their right to have that information lawfully, and whether the third parties talk !!!!!!!!.

With regards to the first, it is all set out in the CoP, plus other information that the ICO has.

As regards talking !!!!!!!!, there are plenty of experts here with a deep insight into that subject.

Thanks, that is why I asked the question, it will also help others to understand ... cheers anyway will wait

Coupon-mad

IamEmanresu wrote: »

As regards talking !!!!!!!!, there are plenty of experts here with a deep insight into that subject.

I can think of one but he's no expert, even though he likes people to think he is. And he's not on this thread. :cool:

beamerguy

Coupon-mad wrote: »

I can think of one but he's no expert, even though he likes people to think he is. And he's not on this thread. :cool:

Shame, question remains unanswered