We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tv Licencing Court Charge
Comments
-
Why wouldn't they know the difference? Magistrates are ordinary people that sit in court a limited number of days a year, they don't live in a vacuum.Cornucopia wrote: »Come on - do you really think that Magistrates would concern themselves over whether one had a Youview box, a Laptop or a Now TV box - or that they would even know the difference?
There may even be some on MSE.Proud member of the wokerati, though I don't eat tofu.Home is where my books are.Solar PV 5.2kWp system, SE facing, >1% shading, installed March 2019.Mortgage free July 20230 -
onomatopoeia99 wrote: »Why wouldn't they know the difference? Magistrates are ordinary people that sit in court a limited number of days a year, they don't live in a vacuum.
There may even be some on MSE.
Is that true though? Aren't they most likely to be white, middle-aged, and middle- or upper-middle classed? (All the ones I have seen were).
In short, exactly the sort of people who couldn't tell a Now TV box with side-loaded Plex from a sonic screwdriver.0 -
Cornucopia wrote: »Is that true though? Aren't they most likely to be white, middle-aged, and middle- or upper-middle classed? (All the ones I have seen were).
In short, exactly the sort of people who couldn't tell a Now TV box with side-loaded Plex from a sonic screwdriver.
Anyone can be a magistrate, you just need to apply.0 -
-
And nor is this the thread for it (sorry). As its not a 'court' change, it is a change in the law.0
-
Cornucopia wrote: »Come on - do you really think that Magistrates would concern themselves over whether one had a Youview box, a Laptop or a Now TV box - or that they would even know the difference?
This is part of the problem, in fact, that there is generally no physical evidence of evasion being captured by TVL, and none required by the Courts.
This change in the law is a recognition that British television has moved into the 21st century digital age.
Just 10 short years ago, only 5% of people accessed on demand or catch up TV. 5 years ago 20% and 2 years ago that moved up to 37%. Both the BBC and the Govt recognised this shift not away from, but with, live linear TV and this was a change that was badly needed. Today, 54% of live linear TV viewers also consume internet TV content. And the BBC iPlayer now offers live linear TV coverage and in HD to boot, line speed permitting (8000Kbps).
Technology can be a wonderful thing, and so is the BBC iPlayer. And being on a TalkTalk YouView box, I believe you'll be getting an upgrade shortly.
0 -
And yet the BBC was saying for a long while that there were very few people (2% IIRC) who were consuming solely catch-up in order to avoid paying the Licence Fee.
Personally, I don't have a problem with the changes, from a purely practical point of view. I like the idea of guilt-trip free viewing.
The wider issue of whether it is necessary for the State to regulate TV viewing at all remains a problem. This is slightly compounded by this change leading the Government and the BBC down the rather dark path of concerning themselves with people's PCs and Phones where they were largely ignoring them previously.
The whole thing as I am sure you are aware is a huge mess already, and it is disappointing that the Government and the BBC have simply bolted on more complexity without addressing the wider issues.0 -
Yes, and I'm sure you know this - only 5% of the population doesn't pay the licence fee.Cornucopia wrote: »And yet the BBC was saying for a long while that there were very few people (2% IIRC) who were consuming solely catch-up in order to avoid paying the Licence Fee.
Not really.Cornucopia wrote: »Personally, I don't have a problem with the changes, from a purely practical point of view. I like the idea of guilt-trip free viewing.
The wider issue of whether it is necessary for the State to regulate TV viewing at all remains a problem. This is slightly compounded by this change leading the Government and the BBC down the rather dark path of concerning themselves with people's PCs and Phones where they were largely ignoring them previously.Cornucopia wrote: »The whole thing as I am sure you are aware is a huge mess already, and it is disappointing that the Government and the BBC have simply bolted on more complexity without addressing the wider issues.
Thats speculation at best.0 -
So they say.Yes, and I'm sure you know this - only 5% of the population doesn't pay the licence fee.
Not really dark, or they won't be concerning themselves with whether people are watching iPlayer on PCs & Phones (but only on TVs and STBs)?Not really.
In what sense? It's my considered opinion as someone with a high degree of understanding of TVL and the Law that it is a mess. I refer you to my signature.Thats speculation at best.
0 -
Lol...
Its not dark in the sense and reality that the BBC won't have access to ones personal internet activities, they'll just have the IP address. Its ones own ISP which has that data.
Capita are a mess (and a bunch of snakes), but will be less of a mess going forward.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

