We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tenant Deposit and Letting Agency
Comments
-
It doesn't matter whether a lease is for 999 years or 6 months and the relevance to the thread was you banging on about breaches to (unenforceable) terms in the TA and being "afraid" that tenants can't do what they like, I was just pointing out that they pretty much can. Even as a freeholder there's only so much you can legally do to the structure of a building without planning permission. If you can't get your head around those concepts then it's probably best that you are no longer going to be a landlord.
If you have evidence the property isn't in the same condition minus fair wear & tear, and can't agree with the tenant on the deductions use the deposit scheme's ADR that's what it's for.
If you want to make a complaint about the letting agency then use their complaints process and of that doesn't get you anywhere then use the redress scheme.
"banging on"...that is hardly fair now is it. The breach is an enforceable breach as they signed it, and followed that point in the TA
I understand property leasing, all variations just fine thank you. Some folk appear to getting confused....I mean you rent a property and basically own it till you leave...that is crazy tenant talk. The link you posted is not relevant as it refers to instances like a landlord thinking he can show up at the house whenever they please, etc. That is clearly not what is being talked about here. I was certainly not that sort of landlord, I mean I even extended the driveway to the side so it was wide enough for them to park their motor home on the driveway.
I will say it again, a tenant certainly cannot do what they like with the property, within boundaries anyway. Landlords for instance will not allow smokers to rent the property, or perhaps for them to have pets. This is the dealio with renting, I have been on both sides of the coin. When anyone rents a residential property, the rent they pay gives them the right to legally reside in that property, not the legal right to own it temporarily (and exercise the rights associated with ownership).
So far they are refusing to do anything like ADR, which means potential court action..arg that is just a load of time not being spent on things choosing which beer to open0 -
You can say it all you like, it doesn't make it so. The link was relevant because it explains property ownership in England & Wales and we're governed by the laws of the land, not your opinions.0
-
"banging on"...that is hardly fair now is it. The breach is an enforceable breach as they signed it, and followed that point in the TA
I understand property leasing, all variations just fine thank you. Some folk appear to getting confused....I mean you rent a property and basically own it till you leave...that is crazy tenant talk. The link you posted is not relevant as it refers to instances like a landlord thinking he can show up at the house whenever they please, etc. That is clearly not what is being talked about here. I was certainly not that sort of landlord, I mean I even extended the driveway to the side so it was wide enough for them to park their motor home on the driveway.
I will say it again, a tenant certainly cannot do what they like with the property, within boundaries anyway. Landlords for instance will not allow smokers to rent the property, or perhaps for them to have pets. This is the dealio with renting, I have been on both sides of the coin. When anyone rents a residential property, the rent they pay gives them the right to legally reside in that property, not the legal right to own it temporarily (and exercise the rights associated with ownership).
So far they are refusing to do anything like ADR, which means potential court action..arg that is just a load of time not being spent on things choosing which beer to open
You're wrong on so many levels.
The tenant can do what they like during the tenancy. Smoke, have pets, whatever.
They just need to return it to the condition it was, less wear and tear.
That's it. You clearly don't understand tenancy law0 -
A tenant cannot do "whatever they want" during the tenancy. They must comply with the terms of the lease.
The issue, so to speak, is that residential tenants are afforded a lot of protection and therefore landlords might not be able to do much apart from evicting through s.21 (if that is possible).
I would also urge not to take internet resources as gospel.0 -
You're wrong on so many levels.
The tenant can do what they like during the tenancy. Smoke, have pets, whatever.
They just need to return it to the condition it was, less wear and tear.
That's it. You clearly don't understand tenancy law
mmmm...No, you and the others do not understand tenancy laws with regards to residential tenancy. Even the government produced model tenancy agreement states the points that I stated, including getting permission for pets and for making any changes to the property, including decor and even putting up a blooming shelf.
My original point was permission was not requested and changes made were not rectified.0 -
mmmm...No, you and the others do not understand tenancy laws with regards to residential tenancy. Even the government produced model tenancy agreement states the points that I stated, including getting permission for pets and for making any changes to the property, including decor and even putting up a blooming shelf.
My original point was permission was not requested and changes made were not rectified.
Let me put it this way.
The tenants totally ignore your terms, all you can do is evict them.
So yes, the tenants can do whatever they want. There's no punishment for doing that.0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »A tenant cannot do "whatever they want" during the tenancy. They must comply with the terms of the lease.
The issue, so to speak, is that residential tenants are afforded a lot of protection and therefore landlords might not be able to do much apart from evicting through s.21 (if that is possible).
I would also urge not to take internet resources as gospel.
Yes, so the tenants can do whatever they want....0 -
So go to the DPS and start ADR.
I think you'll probably win, on the balance of probabilities.
This is the correct answer. You will probably get to keep most of the deposit if not all.
Does the agent or the property owner have the landlord side of the DPS account?
If it's you the landlord it's simplest of all. You need to take firm actions, collect a dossier of photos, this should suffice for the DPS.0 -
mmmm...No, you and the others do not understand tenancy laws with regards to residential tenancy. Even the government produced model tenancy agreement states the points that I stated, including getting permission for pets and for making any changes to the property, including decor and even putting up a blooming shelf.
My original point was permission was not requested and changes made were not rectified.
A model agreement with this disclaimer....
"Disclaimer
This document is being made available free of charge to anyone wishing to use it,
and whilst every care has been taken in its preparation ultimately only a court can
decide on the legal effect and enforceability of contractual terms. The Government
cannot, therefore, guarantee the legal effect of this model agreement and shall not
be held responsible for the consequences of the use of, or reliance on, this model
agreement, including for any financial loss suffered by any landlord, tenant or other
person. If you are in any doubt as to the implications of using this document you
should seek independent legal advice. "0 -
Let me put it this way.
The tenants totally ignore your terms, all you can do is evict them.
So yes, the tenants can do whatever they want. There's no punishment for doing that.
Wow I hate for you to be tenant with that attitude.
Well no, through the process of evidence (against no evidence), they will in all likelihood have to forfeit some deposit so I am not having to pay out of my own pocket to have issues created by themselves rectified.
You and others seem to think I was talking about a landlord shouting through the letterbox at tenants, "turn that TV down", or "clean your bedroom".........I was talking about people doing the decent and right thing...something that is lost in the world of today0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards