We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

cyclists turned right when i overtook

1…626364656668»

Comments

  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    edited 12 February 2017 at 9:01PM
    I'm honestly beginning to think that thee big gaps in activity by krackers is down to whoever's programming it going off and updating it's AI engine.

    We must be onto Krackers 6.1 by now and it still can't pass the Turing test.
  • You know what, I'm starting to think it's easier if we all just say we completely agree with him, just so he'll go away and stop dragging this shoite up every week or two.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 9,210
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    kraken776 wrote: »
    I did make in clear in my OP that i moved all the way into the opposite lane.

    Just as you made it clear in a subsequent post that it didn't happen.
  • Oh god, the Kraken wakes...
  • tho_2
    tho_2 Posts: 326
    Third Anniversary
    Forumite
    edited 13 February 2017 at 9:49AM
    Richard53 wrote: »
    I don't need to check anything, having been a follower of this thread from the start. He said he did, then he said he didn't, and then he started getting hostile with people who said he did, claiming that he had been very clear in several posts that he was only seeking theoretical answers to something that might have happened but didn't. The OP has claimed both scenarios with equal conviction. I think the balance of probabilities is that an accident nearly happened but didn't, but the OP got as irate as if it had and needed to vent. Or something. It's hilarious, whatever, but any comments dealing with the substance of the 'incident' are pretty much unnecessary.

    I've read it all too and I go the other way. He had a accident, came on here looking for justification for his argument, failed to get any, then backed out of it, far too aggressively. I reckon because the cyclist didn't make a claim. The quotes from the insurance company are pretty specific to make up for a "hypothetical" Quite why he digs it up every two weeks are another mystery. Let it go and maybe not overtake in a 30 coming up to a traffic control measure (For what its worth I put it at 50/50, I think the cyclist was probably moving to the right to leave the left lane free for Kraken to undertake and get through the gap, but didn't look, but I dont feel in the situation Krakens overtake was particularly safe). But i do agree. Its hilarious!
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.