Wright Hassall (POPLA) - further evidence request to PPC

pappa_golf

and more WH failures pouring in https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5291822


needs stopping and pulling as its obvious that the ISPA cannot monitor this lot

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

and more WH failures pouring in https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5291822

needs stopping and pulling as its obvious that the ISPA cannot monitor this lot

Think about all those who do not know about these forums ?

The ISPA, in the interests of the general public should inform the Police of their findings and complaints thus far and request a full investigation into the activities of Wright Hassall

pappa_golf

until it gets to court its "civil" sir! contact the citizens advice for help

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

until it gets to court its "civil" sir! contact the citizens advice for help

when it comes to obtaining money by deceit, a different thing

pappa_golf

who cares , not the government , they have palmed it off to the BPA and the mickey mouse club (IPC) , who are basically their to protect their members interests , NOT the end user

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

who cares , not the government , they have palmed it off to the BPA and the mickey mouse club (IPC) , who are basically their to protect their members interests , NOT the end user

We all know the government could not give a toss, just what I told my local MP yesterday

Browny137

Hi everyone,

Earlier today I received an email (from WH on behalf of POPLA) saying that my appeal has been rejected and I must pay within 28 days.

I too got a letter asking for extra evidence, which must be provided within 7 days, but I only received the letter the day before the deadline! However, I did re-itterate my original evidence (Genuine Pre-Estimate of Loss), but there was no reference to this in my final rejection letter.

In addition to this, WH have said they will not respond to any correspondence from either party as this decision is 'final'. Given their very generic rationale for rejecting the appeal I find this very unfair - probably just a scare tactic.

Anyone got opinions on this?

Many thanks,
Adam

pappa_golf

write to the email contact shown on this forum for the ISPA , and complain , you are not the only person , they would be glad to hear from you.


"Earlier today I received an email (from WH on behalf of POPLA) saying that my appeal has been rejected and I must pay within 28 days"


debt collector speak , rubbish , you now have a chance of fighting "scum and Co" in YOUR local county court


mention that that was the only option given to you and its misleading and untrouthful

beamerguy

Browny137 wrote: »

Hi everyone,

Earlier today I received an email (from WH on behalf of POPLA) saying that my appeal has been rejected and I must pay within 28 days.

I too got a letter asking for extra evidence, which must be provided within 7 days, but I only received the letter the day before the deadline! However, I did re-itterate my original evidence (Genuine Pre-Estimate of Loss), but there was no reference to this in my final rejection letter.

In addition to this, WH have said they will not respond to any correspondence from either party as this decision is 'final'. Given their very generic rationale for rejecting the appeal I find this very unfair - probably just a scare tactic.

Anyone got opinions on this?

Many thanks,
Adam

More Wright Hassall ???????

Take your complaint here ...
ISPA - director@ispa.co.uk
Nicola Mullany .... http://ispa.co.uk/board?member=1

The ISPA has already shown concerns about Wright Hassall and claim to be monitoring them.

http://ispa.co.uk/userfiles/files/ISPA%20Statement%20regarding%20the%20appointment%2 0of%20Wright%20Hassall.pdf

It would also be a good idea to copy the Parking Prankster with this one

prankster@parking-prankster.com

Mike172

That's not surprising given the position the filth are in. I was considering ignoring them completely and I think I will now.