Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If we vote to Remain what happens?

1131416181938

Comments

  • gfplux
    gfplux Posts: 4,985 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Hung up my suit!
    Rinoa wrote: »
    I've no doubt there are numerous such agencies covering a multitude of disciplines all over Europe. After Brexit we'll set up our own agencies, every one of which will be UK based employing mostly UK people.

    All those NEW agencies costing money to set up competing for qualified staff (not necessarily UK citizens)
    And slowly bit by bit the money saved (by leaving the EU) is used up.
    There will be no Brexit dividend for Britain.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Rinoa wrote: »
    I've no doubt there are numerous such agencies covering a multitude of disciplines all over Europe. After Brexit we'll set up our own agencies, every one of which will be UK based employing mostly UK people.

    I thought we would be saving money? I thought we would be sweeping away all of those bureaucratic regulations? So in fact we will be creating our own?
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    100 of thousands of jobs are lost and created each year
    anyway most of those particular jobs are filled by non UK citizens

    You are right
    http://ec.europa.eu/civil_service/docs/europa_sp2_bs_nat_x_grade_en.pdf

    Quite surprising how few Brits are employed in the commission, Of course maybe if we had more then we might get a better deal from them! Apparently there is a shortage of candidates for the posts from the UK.

    We will also lose the European Banking Agency based in Cannary Wharf.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    BobQ wrote: »
    I thought we would be saving money? I thought we would be sweeping away all of those bureaucratic regulations? So in fact we will be creating our own?



    We may decide to duplicate an EU agency, alternatively we may agree to part fund it with the EU. Or we may decide the agencies aims could be achieved with fewer staff and based in Rochdale instead of expensive London.

    Most importantly the decision will rest with us, not the EU.
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    BobQ wrote: »

    We will also lose the European Banking Agency based in Cannary Wharf.

    Well, we have all the expertise. For the EU, moving it to another country is messy, disruptive and expensive. You can't just train hundreds of personnel from scratch overnight.

    Just because we're leaving the EU doesn't mean we'll be severing all ties. There may be many areas such as banking where we'll need to work in harmony with the EU. Norway and Iceland have similar arrangements and do host some agencies.
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    Does Mr cvameron beleive that the UK leaving the UK will result in a substantial risk of a major European war as is report ed this morning?

    If he does then what on earth was he doing using brinkmanship to negotiate a small temporary reduction in in-work benefits for EU migrants?

    How can the small saving in benefits/reduction in attractiveness of the UK to EU migrants ever be worth the risk of having to leave the EU if no agreement woud have lead to his campaigning for Brexit.

    From this I conclude that either the negoiations were carried out in bad faith because the UK would have accepted whatever outcome resulted or the PM does not really think that our leaving the EU might lead to continental war.

    Does he say substantial risk or risk?

    It's a good point but I guess the counter-argument is that removing the requirement for the UK to agree a relentless move towards ever closer integration owas the sort of existentialist threat that required taking that risk.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Rinoa wrote: »
    We may decide to duplicate an EU agency, alternatively we may agree to part fund it with the EU. Or we may decide the agencies aims could be achieved with fewer staff and based in Rochdale instead of expensive London.

    Most importantly the decision will rest with us, not the EU.

    Well if we only want to part fund it, the EU might feel they have a tiny say in what happens!

    The whole purpose of these agencies are to organise activities on an EU wide basis. I accept that after a Brexit, if the UK were to work with the EU in a similar way to Norway they "might" consider allowing a UK based agency to continue being based in the UK for the time being. But if, as many Brexit supporters advocate, we exist outside of the EU, why would they want us to be involved in (for example) getting a new drug through the approvals processes in Italy?
    Rinoa wrote: »
    Well, we have all the expertise. For the EU, moving it to another country is messy, disruptive and expensive. You can't just train hundreds of personnel from scratch overnight.

    True but I doubt it would continue unless we were in a Norway like arrangement which would mean we were funding most of what you want us to stop funding.
    Just because we're leaving the EU doesn't mean we'll be severing all ties. There may be many areas such as banking where we'll need to work in harmony with the EU.
    .

    Pleased to hear it. Of course we can negotiate with the EU on banking regulation and systems, in the same way that the US speak to the EU. But the US are not as far as I know involved in the European Banking Agency.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    BobQ wrote: »
    Well if we only want to part fund it, the EU might feel they have a tiny say in what happens!

    The whole purpose of these agencies are to organise activities on an EU wide basis. I accept that after a Brexit, if the UK were to work with the EU in a similar way to Norway they "might" consider allowing a UK based agency to continue being based in the UK for the time being. But if, as many Brexit supporters advocate, we exist outside of the EU, why would they want us to be involved in (for example) getting a new drug through the approvals processes in Italy?



    True but I doubt it would continue unless we were in a Norway like arrangement which would mean we were funding most of what you want us to stop funding.



    Pleased to hear it. Of course we can negotiate with the EU on banking regulation and systems, in the same way that the US speak to the EU. But the US are not as far as I know involved in the European Banking Agency.

    There will be many possibilities outside the EU and it depends on your point of view whether you wish to look for the negative in any situation.

    If the EU want to co-operate, fine. If they don't we'll just do what other free countries do and manage our affairs however we think appropriate.
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • gfplux
    gfplux Posts: 4,985 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Hung up my suit!
    Rinoa wrote: »
    There will be many possibilities outside the EU and it depends on your point of view whether you wish to look for the negative in any situation.

    If the EU want to co-operate, fine. If they don't we'll just do what other free countries do and manage our affairs however we think appropriate.

    Yes let's manage our affairs at our expense.
    There will be no Brexit dividend for Britain.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    gfplux wrote: »
    Yes let's manage our affairs at our expense.

    at the moment we pay to manage our affairs and we pay to manage a large share of the EUs too
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BobQ wrote: »


    But if, as many Brexit supporters advocate, we exist outside of the EU, why would they want us to be involved in (for example) getting a new drug through the approvals processes in Italy?




    Pfizer, and many more non EU drugs companies trade with EU citizens no problem. Microsoft, Samsung, Sony and all the rest sell things to Europe.


    Trade will always come about as long as we provide products and services people wish to buy.


    This obsession with political union is quite the oddest thing
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.