We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

LPS sent me harassment texts

124

Comments

  • dazster
    dazster Posts: 502 Forumite
    beamerguy is wrong as usual, there is no single answer to blocking numbers on a mobile, it depends what kind of mobile it is.

    Android: apps can be installed to do this, and no I don't have a list of them, just use Google.

    Windows: the facility is built-in, just long-click the number and then choose the option to block it, simples

    iPhone: built-in, as noted above.
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    dazster wrote: »
    beamerguy is wrong as usual, there is no single answer to blocking numbers on a mobile, it depends what kind of mobile it is.

    Android: apps can be installed to do this, and no I don't have a list of them, just use Google.

    Windows: the facility is built-in, just long-click the number and then choose the option to block it, simples

    iPhone: built-in, as noted above.

    Wrong Baz ???

    There are countless 1000's of phones around that are basic, they cannot block or accept apps. So readers are not confused by this, their local phone shop or network provider is the best place for advice
  • fisherjim
    fisherjim Posts: 7,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    beamerguy wrote: »
    Wrong Baz ???

    There are countless 1000's of phones around that are basic, they cannot block or accept apps. So readers are not confused by this, their local phone shop or network provider is the best place for advice

    No I think you are running away with yourself as usual BG the OP has shown screenshots of his iPhone so the resolve is a simple matter.

    All this bickering is not helpful at all:o
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 4 April 2016 at 11:44AM
    fisherjim wrote: »
    No I think you are running away with yourself as usual BG the OP has shown screenshots of his iPhone so the resolve is a simple matter.

    All this bickering is not helpful at all:o

    Fisher, the screen shots came after the posts, at the time the OP simply stated he could not block on his phone.
    You should have seen that ?
    This whole bickering thing came about when another poster talked about apps to block which was not good advice if you cannot do it. And, the screenshots came after his post so even he would not know
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    edited 4 April 2016 at 12:44PM
    beamerguy wrote: »
    Fisher, the screen shots came after the posts, at the time the OP simply stated he could not block on his phone.
    You should have seen that ?
    This whole bickering thing came about when another poster talked about apps to block which was not good advice if you cannot do it. And, the screenshots came after his post so even he would not know
    No.


    The advice to block the texts (which was suggested in #2) was correct! (As subsequently was the action confirmed by the OP!)


    The bickering only arose when you decided to advise the OP to contact the debt collector, thereby confirming the number they were using is not only "live" but belongs to their perceived "debtor", and didn't like it when your bad advice was pointed out!
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 4 April 2016 at 1:52PM
    Quentin wrote: »
    No.


    The advice to block the texts (which was suggested in #2) was correct! (As subsequently was confirmed by the OP!)


    The bickering only arose when you decided to advise the OP to contact the debt collector, thereby confirming the number they were using is not only "live" but belongs to their perceived "debtor", and didn't like it when your bad advice was pointed out!

    This is a pointless conversation with you as usual

    The opt-out or stop does not perceive anything with just a mobile number and in particular as the OP said, he did not know how they got his number. So, he treats it as spam/unsolicited text which he did not invite. Hence if they ignore the simple instructions of opt-out, he can then issue a complaint.

    It does not admit that he/she is that person or indeed admit to anything ? It is a simple annoying spam text like we all get.
    Advice was given on the basis that the OP stated he did not know
    how they got his number.
    If infact the OP had somewhere along the line given his number then that is different. He said he did not know how they got his number ?

    Maybe someone gave them his number, maybe they have contacts within the mobile industry to get his number from his address, who knows but as it stands right now based on the info he gave here, these are spam text and should be treated as such by the normal method. Saying opt-out does not remotely identify who it is.
    Suppose his phone had been stolen or someone else was using it and replied to the spam text, the sender won't have a clue.

    At the end of the day, the 100% guaranteed way to stop them is a new SIM card even though he would have to tell all his contacts his new number
  • fisherjim
    fisherjim Posts: 7,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    beamerguy wrote: »
    Fisher, the screen shots came after the posts, at the time the OP simply stated he could not block on his phone.
    You should have seen that ?
    This whole bickering thing came about when another poster talked about apps to block which was not good advice if you cannot do it. And, the screenshots came after his post so even he would not know

    Wrong again!
    The OP showed screen shots in post 28.
    You were still advising messing about going to a phone shop in post 33, and now in post 37 getting a new SIM card with all the messing about that entails.

    As for obtaining the telephone number, many people are naive enough to give their mobile number when giving details to the DVLA.
    This is not compulsory but people do it, and we know they have no scruples in passing everything on including inside leg measurement.

    I would think the OP's head is spinning with all these off tangent replies!
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    fisherjim wrote: »
    Wrong again!
    The OP showed screen shots in post 28.
    You were still advising messing about going to a phone shop in post 33, and now in post 37 getting a new SIM card with all the messing about that entails.

    As for obtaining the telephone number, many people are naive enough to give their mobile number when giving details to the DVLA.
    This is not compulsory but people do it, and we know they have no scruples in passing everything on including inside leg measurement.

    I would think the OP's head is spinning with all these off tangent replies!

    NO NOT WRONG AGAIN
    Just pointing out the order the posts went. You did not see ?
    A new SIM card as another way to stop the harassment, surely you would understand this ? These are some of things people have to do to stop spam text, it's a sad world . And you said stop bickering ? HA

    I agree that people wrongly give their number to DVLA but that does not mean the OP did and that is of no help.
    Thinking about this, it could well be that the OP phoned them and hence his number was logged, you work it out but in the meantime his only desire is to stop the spam text but as usual this type of thread attracts a volume of different ideas to the point of rudeness.

    It's gone off piste and is now dead.
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    edited 4 April 2016 at 4:21PM
    fisherjim wrote: »

    I would think the OP's head is spinning with all these off tangent replies!....
    If so we can help the OP on how to block out posts from his thread!!
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 4 April 2016 at 4:46PM
    Quentin wrote: »
    If so we can help the OP on how to block out pests from his thread!!

    Stop this stupid bickering Quentin, it really is very childish and very boring

    " but as usual this type of thread attracts a volume of different ideas to the point of rudeness."
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.