We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.
Comments
-
-
Shakethedisease wrote: »You learn to grow a thick skin after a while.
Prove me wrong about the ignorance then and address the points I made about the "Business for Scotland" meme being passed around on #ScotRef.
And then about the points I made, recently backed up by Kevin Hague + 2 economics professors, regarding the GERS statistics being completely adequate and in line with other statistical analysis on economic output.
Is the meme correct or not?
Are Kevin, the two professors and myself correct about the GERS statistics or not?
And why.
Because from where I stand/sit the meme is a slam dunk propaganda piece and Richard Murphy appears not to know his backside from his elbow and probably ought to worry about his career now (and he's a Corbyn advisor!).
0 -
Robertson saying 'Scotland will have it's referendum' to a standing ovation. So I think we can safely say 'something' and a plan B was planned in the event of May trying to delay it.Resolution three on Voting Franchise now at #SNP17 conference: extending the votes so that "anyone who makes Scotland their home can vote"It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
I don't think Scottish Independence is going away soon. I can't see why they'd keep voting in the SNP if they didn't want it.
Because people were fed up with Scottish Labour 'divine right to rule' attitude. I doubt if I'm the only person who has voted SNP previously but voted 'No' in 2014The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer0 -
paparossco wrote: »Because people were fed up with Scottish Labour 'divine right to rule' attitude. I doubt if I'm the only person who has voted SNP but voted 'No' in 20140
-
Shakethedisease wrote: »Robertson saying 'Scotland will have it's referendum' to a standing ovation. So I think we can safely say 'something' and a plan B was planned in the event of May trying to delay it.
Having a illegal referendum would be beyond stupid.....if you want the EU to take you seriously....
....but have an illegal referendum and see how many friends you have then....
....what will you do if nobody turns out?
....what will you do if you lose?Turn your face to the sun and the shadows fall behind you.0 -
TrickyTree83 wrote: »Prove me wrong about the ignorance then and address the points I made about the "Business for Scotland" meme being passed around on #ScotRef.
And then about the points I made, recently backed up by Kevin Hague + 2 economics professors, regarding the GERS statistics being completely adequate and in line with other statistical analysis on economic output.
Is the meme correct or not?
Are Kevin, the two professors and myself correct about the GERS statistics or not?
And why.
Because from where I stand/sit the meme is a slam dunk propaganda piece and Richard Murphy appears not to know his backside from his elbow and probably ought to worry about his career now (and he's a Corbyn advisor!).
I don't know much about meme's and while the tweeting spat between Murphy ( who blundered into the whole thing unaware via a simple tweet ) has been entertaining. Neither of them can be proved right or wrong. Hague talks.. obsessively it seems.. about GERS and the figures within them. Murphy, thinks the very data which forms GERS is unreliable, relies to much on estimates and extrapolation and could be manipulated to suit, let's just say an 'end point'.
Who knows who's right or wrong.
Here's a good meme for you though, because while we never hear enough about 'one in a generation' we never seem to hear about Ruth's wee proclaimations. Is this meme correct or not ?It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
posh*spice wrote: »Having a illegal referendum would be beyond stupid.....if you want the EU to take you seriously....see how many friends you have then........what will you do if nobody turns out?....what will you do if you lose?It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »It won't be illegal, it will be 'advisory'.Don't blame me, I voted Remain.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards