Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.

Options
13443453473493501544

Comments

  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    ...
    I mean - you can't really be telling me that a population would vote for such abstract concepts as 'sovereignty' and 'control' even when all the experts noted there would be significant short term economic pain...
    ...

    Like with any exam, it pays to read the question in front of you.

    If it says "UK" on the ballot paper, it means "UK".

    Perhaps it should have said "bits of the UK who can be bothered to vote in numbers".
  • Not an argument. .

    Oh, I rather suspect the Brexiteers would disagree with you...

    Seemed to work well enough for them. ;)

    As for me I'll just embrace this brave new world and vote for sovereignty and control rather than short term economic well being.

    :)
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • kabayiri wrote: »
    Like with any exam, it pays to read the question in front of you.

    If it says "UK" on the ballot paper, it means "UK".

    Good to know.

    So when Scotland holds a referendum and answers 'Yes' to the question 'Should Scotland Leave the UK' then what the UK chooses to do will be of no further relevance to us.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • elantan
    elantan Posts: 21,022 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Will you, Shake and Leanne be writing and singing a song to the rest of Scotland when you put half a million Scottish jobs on the line?

    I take it you liked the video then ?
  • elantan
    elantan Posts: 21,022 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    kabayiri wrote: »
    So do Londoners, and they will have to abide by Brexit.

    They also had better turnout figures than Scotland.

    Not hard. Many places in the UK had people who cared enough to vote. Too many in Scotland were apathetic when it came to voting.

    If you care you vote, it's simple really.

    When did London become a country ?
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Good to know.

    So when Scotland holds a referendum and answers 'Yes' to the question 'Should Scotland Leave the UK' then what the UK chooses to do will be of no further relevance to us.

    Personally for me, yes. I've no problem with it.

    Scots are obviously more interested in leaving the UK than leaving the EU.

    The turnout figures for each referendum clearly show this. 84% turnout vs just 67%.

    Or could it be referendum fatigue? ;). At a rate of decline of 17% per referendum, you will be lucky in getting 1 in 2 showing up next time.
  • Oh, I rather suspect the Brexiteers would disagree with you...

    Seemed to work well enough for them. ;)

    As for me I'll just embrace this brave new world and vote for sovereignty and control rather than short term economic well being.

    :)

    So why aren't you happy with brexit then?

    If what you claim brexit to be is sacrificing short term economic wellbeing how can you at the same time advocate doing the same, but an order of magnitude worse to Scotland.

    You cannot be against brexit for those reasons and pro independence for the very same reasons. Which is why I said it's not an argument.

    Come on Hamish. If you're happy to screw Scotland why aren't you happy to screw Scotland significantly less and remain in the union?
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 10 October 2016 at 11:12AM
    If what you claim brexit to be is sacrificing short term economic wellbeing how can you at the same time advocate doing the same, but an order of magnitude worse to Scotland.

    As I said it's a Brave New World....

    Good is bad and down is up.

    Sovereignty matters more than prosperity.

    Post-truth politics rule the day and if you can't beat them, join them.
    So why aren't you happy with brexit then?

    Because I'm a Unionist.

    I believe Scotland would be better off in the UK which would be better off in the EU.

    But if you make me choose one union or the other I'll choose remaining part of the Worlds 2nd largest economy over the worlds [STRIKE]5th largest[/STRIKE] 6th largest economy.... Which without Scotland would be in danger of further relegation down to 7th largest economy.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • TrickyTree83
    TrickyTree83 Posts: 3,930 Forumite
    edited 10 October 2016 at 11:37AM
    Because I'm a Unionist.

    I believe Scotland would be better off in the UK which would be better off in the EU.

    But if you make me choose one union or the other I'll choose remaining part of the Worlds 2nd largest economy over the worlds [STRIKE]5th largest[/STRIKE] 6th largest economy.... Which without Scotland would be in danger of further relegation down to 7th largest economy.

    You've still not answered why you would risk 64% of trade / half a million Scottish jobs by leaving the Union and joining the EU instead of sticking with the union and only risking 11% of Scottish trade and 80,000 jobs.

    As a unionist I would think your choice was simple. So there must be something you're not telling everyone as to why you see the single market and the EU as trumping your belief in the union and making it worthwhile to take 6 times as much risk as sticking with the union you claim to support.

    Your position is at odds with the views you claim to have, they don't reconcile.

    Edit: how about just filling in the rest of the below sentences.

    Risking 64% of Scottish trade and the associated jobs is the best option because...

    Risking 11% of Scottish trade and the associated jobs is the worst option because...
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    But if you make me choose one union or the other I'll choose remaining part of the Worlds 2nd largest economy over the worlds [STRIKE]5th largest[/STRIKE] 6th largest economy.... Which without Scotland would be in danger of further relegation down to 7th largest economy.

    That won't be the choice on offer.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.