Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

London

123578

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    London will indeed cope

    maybe a small insignificant waver then
    -higher wages with the wall of immigration halted
    -increased productivity as it will now pay be invest in innovation
    -young Londoners will have a lower housing costs
    -young Londoner will be better able to live in a family sized property
    -reduction in taxes due to lower contributions to the EU (and to the Scots if they become turkeys voting for xmas)
    -increased engagement with the rest of the world rather than the declining white christian european world

    quality of life for the people of the UK to increase as well as per capita GDP (for the people who worship that god)
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    London will indeed cope

    maybe a small insignificant waver then
    -higher wages with the wall of immigration halted
    -increased productivity as it will now pay be invest in innovation
    -young Londoners will have a lower housing costs
    -young Londoner will be better able to live in a family sized property
    -reduction in taxes due to lower contributions to the EU (and to the Scots if they become turkeys voting for xmas)
    -increased engagement with the rest of the world rather than the declining white christian european world

    quality of life for the people of the UK to increase as well as per capita GDP (for the people who worship that god)


    even if all that happened free movement of people will be back at some point once the old are dead and the young accept that telling their long lost cousins that they cant move into the town next door is silly

    2200 or before that date for full free movement of humanity

    question will be does England become one of the worlds mega countries with yes a big population and lots of wealth due to embracing free movement sooner or do we become...stoke-on-trent?
  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    cells wrote: »
    question will be does England become one of the worlds mega countries with yes a big population and lots of wealth due to embracing free movement sooner or do we become...stoke-on-trent?

    God forbid. They must be miserable out there with their cheap homes.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    cells wrote: »
    even if all that happened free movement of people will be back at some point once the old are dead and the young accept that telling their long lost cousins that they cant move into the town next door is silly

    2200 or before that date for full free movement of humanity

    question will be does England become one of the worlds mega countries with yes a big population and lots of wealth due to embracing free movement sooner or do we become...stoke-on-trent?


    Today, free movement of people would lead to world wide wars with hundreds or maybe thousands of millions dead.

    once we have world peace for 50 years, the abolition of religion, abolition of poverty, the withering away of the state, free energy then free movement of the few people left might be a reality.

    Why you want the UK to become an overcrowded island with no quality of life, is presumably due to some deep seated dislike of the UK.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Today, free movement of people would lead to world wide wars with hundreds or maybe thousands of millions dead.

    once we have world peace for 50 years, the abolition of religion, abolition of poverty, the withering away of the state, free energy then free movement of the few people left might be a reality.

    Why you want the UK to become an overcrowded island with no quality of life, is presumably due to some deep seated dislike of the UK.


    well yes over the next hundred years the world will get a lot richer wars will decline religion will decline and energy in real terms will be cheaper too and I think English will become the worlds primary language. At that stage as you suggest maybe not a lot of people would want to move however even small flows of people will have dramatic impacts on some places (like London). Even now plenty of people from rich countries move to other countries think of all the Americans or Germans or French in the UK or the brits in those countries.

    I dont think a dense city is a bad city.
    But importantly a rich dense growing city always gives you an opt out and pays you handsomely for it. Thank the foreigner who is willing to pay you £2m for your terrace house and go live in the countryside somewhere

    While if we vote out and say our population instead of growing to 100 million contracts to 50 million then we will be poorer as a nation and London will contract to an insignificant city and all those Londoners who want to move to the countryside can no longer get £2 million for their terrace and would have to settle for two shillings
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    cells wrote: »
    well yes over the next hundred years the world will get a lot richer wars will decline religion will decline and energy in real terms will be cheaper too and I think English will become the worlds primary language. At that stage as you suggest maybe not a lot of people would want to move however even small flows of people will have dramatic impacts on some places (like London). Even now plenty of people from rich countries move to other countries think of all the Americans or Germans or French in the UK or the brits in those countries.

    I dont think a dense city is a bad city.
    But importantly a rich dense growing city always gives you an opt out and pays you handsomely for it. Thank the foreigner who is willing to pay you £2m for your terrace house and go live in the countryside somewhere

    While if we vote out and say our population instead of growing to 100 million contracts to 50 million then we will be poorer as a nation and London will contract to an insignificant city and all those Londoners who want to move to the countryside can no longer get £2 million for their terrace and would have to settle for two shillings

    no I don't thank all the foreigners who make it impossible for the under 40s to live in a decent sized house in London/SE.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Sorry, I assume this is intended to be a joke but I don't understand it


    It was tongue in cheek, yes. I was just pointing out that you criticise others for lack of knowledge about history and oppose freedom of movement. 2000 years ago most of the planet had no concept of a national border (eg Africa)
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BobQ wrote: »
    It was tongue in cheek, yes. I was just pointing out that you criticise others for lack of knowledge about history and oppose freedom of movement. 2000 years ago most of the planet had no concept of a national border (eg Africa)

    do you actually know anything at all about the society of 2000 years ago?

    -no kingdoms?
    -no warlords?
    -no taxation?
    -no empires
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    do you actually know anything at all about the society of 2000 years ago?

    -no kingdoms?
    -no warlords?
    -no taxation?
    -no empires

    Enough to know that there were no borders and so there was theoretically complete freedom of movement. (As far as you walk)

    You said "I do not support the free movement of all the people of the world" as if it were a modern construct of the EU.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    no I don't thank all the foreigners who make it impossible for the under 40s to live in a decent sized house in London/SE.


    That was the case 65 years ago too in a much more white London.
    London housing stock has always been quite small and not all that decent.

    If anything homes are now bigger and better and people live in them at a lower density than 65 years ago and ownership is higher too


    So care to retract your statement?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.