We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If we vote for Brexit what happens

1111611171119112111222072

Comments

  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    stator wrote: »
    Bit off topic, but are people like Sturgeon seriously suggesting that if the UK leaves the single market and trade barriers go up, that Scotland would be better off inside the EU, damaging trade between Scotland and the UK, than it would inside the UK and damaging trade between Scotland and the EU?
    I can't believe that anyone would even suggest that the Scottish economy isn't intertwinned with the rest of the UK

    You mean like the Eire -UK is interconnected?
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BobQ wrote: »
    I never said anyone mentally ill. Mental illness is not related to intelligence.

    I do not condemn anyone for lacking intelligence. The world would be equally badly afflicted if decisions were limited to the most intelligent voters. I just acknowledge that it is the price we must pay for democracy.

    what I posted was
    the left has some history of condemning opposition as mental subnormal or mentally ill
    sadly little is learned from history although one isn't surprised

    and contrast it with your critisism that people who didn't agree with your were lacking intelligence
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    BobQ wrote: »
    Thank you Thrugelmir.

    Maybe the UK should invite her to negotiate the Brexit agreement for us?:)

    I think the penny may just be dropping that soft Brexit might not be an actual choice.

    The govt have taken a hard-ish Brexit stance, not because it's necessarily the choice they want to take, but because it's the most likely outcome. Better to prepare markets and the public for that eventuality sooner rather than later.
    Probabaly also better to focus time and effort mitigating for the downsides of hard Brexit rather than desperately trying to fight a lost cause.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You cannot simply ignore the very meaning of the word sovereignty because it's inconvenient.

    It boils down to this:

    Inside the EU = not sovereign

    Why? = Because "noun. A state with a defined territory that administers its own government and is not subject to or dependent on another power" Therefore every EU member state is subject to another power for some of it's legislation.

    Outside the EU = sovereign

    Interesting argument. Is the UK's energy supply sovereign? Is its food supply sovereign? Is its steel supply sovereign? Is its supply of computers sovereign? Is our ability to defend ourselves sovereign?

    Inside the EU = Not sovereign
    Outside the EU = Not sovereign
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • Ballard
    Ballard Posts: 2,986 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    could you give us your indepth analaysis of what will happen to our services industry after brexit so we can all learn from you

    None of us know so we have uncertainty. Before the vote we didn't have uncertainty. Uncertainty is not thought to be a beneficial thing for business.

    I hope that that's simple enough for you to understand.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ballard wrote: »
    None of us know so we have uncertainty. Before the vote we didn't have uncertainty. Uncertainty is not thought to be a beneficial thing for business.

    I hope that that's simple enough for you to understand.

    lets take an example

    the rewards on investment in future projects are uncertain.

    I hope you can understand the implications but please feel free to ask if you don't.
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    The solution to the stupidity of Brexit voters and their xenophobia should be education.

    Instead the UK has decided to respond by pulling itself out of the biggest trading bloc on the planet.

    It's like treating appendicitis by amputating a leg, and makes about as much sense.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    mrginge wrote: »
    I think the penny may just be dropping that soft Brexit might not be an actual choice.
    I think the more extreme Brexiteers have a strategy to make a soft Brexit impossible, the characterisation of the Remainers as Remoaners being part of that strategy.
    The govt have taken a hard-ish Brexit stance, not because it's necessarily the choice they want to take, but because it's the most likely outcome. Better to prepare markets and the public for that eventuality sooner rather than later.

    The Government's stance is more to do with holding together a divided party and a divided nation. The nation now comprises a continuum ranging from soft to hard Brexit supporters.
    Probabaly also better to focus time and effort mitigating for the downsides of hard Brexit rather than desperately trying to fight a lost cause.

    If by that you mean we should all accept that we are leaving the EU and the need to get our nation in the best position possible I agree.

    But the trouble is that the hard Brexit supporters see it as an evangelical enterprise and are determined to demonise those who want to have a meaningful debate on what Brexit options are best for the UK as not supporting their righteous cause. That means denigrating soft Brexit thinking and attacking Bremoaners as negative.

    It appears the debate will go no in Government and the public will have to accept whatever they decide.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The solution to the stupidity of Brexit voters and their xenophobia should be education.

    Instead the UK has decided to respond by pulling itself out of the biggest trading bloc on the planet.

    It's like treating appendicitis by amputating a leg, and makes about as much sense.

    nothing like that
    but it would be interesting to know why you adopt the Rotherham solution to known child expolitation in the largest trading bloc in the world.
    In such a rich block one would think that there would be resources to obey the law and protect such vulnerble children.
    Not something you would consider important as it lacks the all important hatred for the people of the uK. Of course the homophobic parts of the largest trading block in the world wouldn't be of concern to you either.
  • gfplux
    gfplux Posts: 4,985 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Hung up my suit!
    Don't worry. It's the opinion of one man. The other problem is he could be called an expert. Oh and another reason to dismiss it, it was reported in the Guardian. Plus it was reported on the Google finance page, so it's got to be rubbish, hasn't it?

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/22/leading-banks-set-to-pull-out-of-brexit-uk

    "Britain’s biggest banks are preparing to relocate out of the UK in the first few months of 2017 amid growing fears over the impending Brexit negotiations, while smaller banks are making plans to get out before Christmas."
    There will be no Brexit dividend for Britain.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.